IMO, taking the long position, i see a merger benefiting shareholders on both Continents.
AWM, having to raise BAY"s 20% plus the carring cost is likly a 30 % handicap to AWM financial raises.
AWM , owning 80 % of Storm minus BAY"s 30% handicap ..
. 100 % in control of all operations
. $ 40 Million MK
BAY, owning 20% of Storm
. no cost upto Bankable PS
. owns 2 % Royalty
. owns a TSX exc Listing..
. $ 20 Million MK
AWM / BAY..
PS,.it was thought the BAY sym, connection to BAY,ST. would help investors remember the Company ..merging to-gether and having a TSx listing in Canada keeping the same sym or thinking BAW being available. BA being BAY & AW being AWM.
BAW, with a Canadian listing showing 400,000 tns 43-101 PFS. imo would see a better return than AWM just trading in Austraila owning 80 % and BAY only maintaing 20% might not see the true value..
IMO, a merger would see a instant 10 % lifted while now enjoying a multi Billion PFS with a TSX listing would allow BAW to raise Millions through the Canadian Flowthrough tax Casino'
BAW, being a Canadian mining company may not be subjected to any US Tarrifs while AWM may-be if keeping their Aussie Listing..
AWM-BAY, now BAW seeing a $ 60m MK with a combine 1 Billion share float should see a two to one consolidation which would leave BAW with a 500,000m trading float and a 4 $Billion PFS..
BAW , share holders would now realize the true value owning 100 % of the 140k block with a 43-101 showing a surface open-pit 20k from tide.
BAW, BAW, BAW
Let The Drills Be Our Friends
Traps7