Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Blue Sky Uranium Corp V.BSK

Alternate Symbol(s):  BKUCF

Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a uranium and vanadium exploration company. The Company controls more than 480,000 hectares with the potential for uranium resources in Rio Negro, Chubut, Neuquen, and Mendoza provinces. Its projects include the Amarillo Grande Project, the Sierra Colonia Project, the Tierras Coloradas Project, Cerro Parva Project, Corcovo Project, and Chihuidos Project. The Company's... see more

TSXV:BSK - Post Discussion

Blue Sky Uranium Corp > NEW THOUGHTS ...
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Oct 21, 2024 1:14am

NEW THOUGHTS ...

Sask Research Council ----->  uranium green rock some type of silicate  
BSK ------> coined it Ivanaite

7 nearby mines
Chlorite Group ----> silicate
Quartz  ---------------> silicate


bsk's green rock uranium  ( petrograph report )
= co2 was made mention of
= could point to ------> co2 formula ( Torbernite crystal structure )

Purple Rocks -------> Potassic
Phosphorus ---------> green rock --------> Torbernite ( Uranium copper phospate ) species )
Chalcedony ----------> Malena mine nearby

12+ yrs of boring / augering soft sands
augering aside of --------> raised hump topography

Same Topographyy
= same raised topography as 7 nearby mines.
= bsk should've drilled the raised hardrock topography

Assaying
= bsk press releases do make mention of 45 element assaying
= assaying should be revealed to investors


Open in new window - zoom in
one ill see both U arms of Ivana deposit align with raised topography
2 U arms align with raised topography  strike NE to SW
I've outlined just one of the two strikes ( black dotted recrangle )


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54080576651_231185b75d_b.jpg


In one of my former posts i addressed ore tonnage
I also pointed out stockpiles and processing study was not in 2024 pea saved for pfs
6500m x 750m x 25m deep x 2.5 ore weight
= 304,687,500 million tonnes


8 species of copper near Ivana
what if ?

Suppose 0.2 % Cu  ( hypothetical )   bsk should've revealed 45 element assays  grrr !
x = 304,687,500 million tonnes
= 609,375 Cu  tonnes
x 2200 ( lb conversion )
= 1,340,625,000  billion Cu  lbs

Just soft ores and uranium oxides measured ( hardrock stones nope )
Now take a second look at Ivana's 2 raised U arm strike paths
They extend several  Km's SW and NE
Then factor 2 salars silts and brines not tested



2012 - 2024  ------> played in the soft sands
no 45 assay reveal
meanwhile 7 nearby mines with closest to Ivana having 8 copper species
And Grosso is into brines but didn't test picos and indio ?
How does one justify the outstanding shares vs doubled up pea since 2019 ?


Not investment advice
Simply sharing research to exisiting shareholders


Cheers...

Done researching
Seen enough


Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities