Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Bowood Energy Inc V.BWD

TSXV:BWD - Post Discussion

Bowood Energy Inc > Off Topic, sort of
View:
Post by Sonny7 on Mar 08, 2012 2:25pm

Off Topic, sort of

Exxon to spend $150B US

 

Exxon Mobil Corp. said Thursday that it will spend about $150 billion US over the next five years to find more oil and natural gas to meet an expected increase in global energy demand.

In a statement issued ahead of a presentation at the New York Stock Exchange, CEO Rex Tillerson said huge investments are needed to expand the supply of traditional fuels like oil and gas while also advancing new energy sources.

Exxon, the world's largest publicly traded energy company, expects global energy demand to increase 30 per cent by 2040, compared with 2010 levels.

Among its holdings is a 70 per cent interest in Calgary-based Imperial Oil Ltd., which is one of Canada's largest integrated oil and gas companies — active in exploration, production, refining, distribution and retailing.

Imperial's Kearl oilsands development in northern Alberta was cited Thursday by Exxon as one of nine major projects worldwide that's expected to start up in the next two years.

Besides the $10.9-billion first phase of the Kearl project, Imperial announced on February 3 it has decided to go ahead with a $2-billion expansion of its Cold Lake oilsands operation — which is already's Imperial's largest producing asset.

Exxon said Thursday it will boost its overall capital budget, including investments in its refining and chemicals business, by 29 per cent from 2012 to 2016 to $185 billion, or about $37 billion a year.

Exxon to hike investment in gas

Exxon, Chevron Corp., BP and Royal Dutch Shell all produced less crude last year than in the prior year. They're struggling to tap new sources of oil fast enough in an environment where big finds are rarer and costlier to exploit. Potential fields lie deep under the seabed, or in -**shale rock formations that require expensive technology to crack open**-.

When Exxon can't find oil fast enough, it is stuck with existing fields where production is declining.

Exxon is investing more of its money in producing natural gas, which the company believes will replace coal as the second-most popular fuel by 2025. The company spent more than $30 billion in 2010 to acquire XTO Energy and become the largest natural gas producer in the U.S.

Its natural gas bet so far hasn't paid off. Prices have plummeted this year following a production boom in North America and weak winter heating demand. Natural gas futures hit a 10-year low of $2.302 per 1,000 cubic feet on Wednesday.

Competitors such as Chesapeake Energy Corp. and ConocoPhillips have cut back on natural gas production this year in an effort to reduce a national surplus, but Exxon says it will keep its gas wells in operation.

High oil prices have supported Exxon's financial performance. Exxon's net income rose almost 35 per cent in 2011.

Exxon shares fell 87 cents, or one per cent, in late morning trading Thursday to $84.96.

Comment by chizled on Mar 08, 2012 4:47pm
A good read and not really off topic for BWD investors .  Similar in the fact that Exxon understands with their purchase of XTO that it will be rewarded over time .  Same as BWD investors , timing might not have been the best but overtime the assets will pay off .  Big oil companies struggling to tap new sources of oil. They realize big finds are rarer and costlier to expoloit . At ...more  
Comment by nlr2 on Mar 08, 2012 8:59pm
So I listened to the LEG presentation and the final question was about the Alberta Bakken. Yanko said they are watching the production, doesnt have to do anything till summer. They always thought the play always offered attractive IP's but they get paid on reserves so they are waiting to see the production history. They think there is a play there but they are doing the science (pressure ...more  
Comment by lockstock99 on Mar 08, 2012 9:38pm
Actually not off topic at all. If you look at their slide they indicate a per well cost of $2.5 million and an EOR of 135 thousand barrels giving an IRR of something like 90%- I don't have the slides in front of me. The per well cost seems incredibly low as does the eventual EOR. They are obviously being noncommittal about the Alberta Bakken at this point and to me the numbers they are putting ...more  
Comment by nlr2 on Mar 08, 2012 9:55pm
Ya I agree that the slide is clearly wrong. Yanko said that well costs were higher then expected but they had a clear view on reducing them. Personally I think Argosy's slide from there presentation I think is the most realistic guideline for costs, reserve IP etc. Until BWD or LEG releases results or TORC's results enter the public record I agree that GSY has the closest comp, at least ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities