Comment by
Coldfrog on May 16, 2012 1:21pm
Not true Those who spend millions to buy and exercise at 0.12 had no obligation to buy and did not take that risk for a 1¢ profit. Other transactions take place now and this will be explained ou unveiled shortly.
Comment by
stateside on May 16, 2012 1:52pm
Not true LOL - I guess we'll see in a few weeks won't we? stateside
Comment by
dangert on May 16, 2012 3:36pm
I believe these are shorts covering. remember it went up as high as .24 cents on NR. lots of shorts that day. Peter is covering IMO.
Comment by
stateside on May 16, 2012 10:28pm
I believe these are shorts covering. remember it went up as high as .24 cents on NR. lots of shorts that day. Peter is covering IMO. Since May 1st (discovery announcement was May 3rd), Peters has bought 1,467,000 shares and sold 0 (as in none) shares. stateside
Comment by
dangert on May 16, 2012 11:43pm
they can be anonymous. so you can't tell for sure. they could be the biggest shorters and seeing nobody is selling under .125 they started covering here. I believe they are covering which is not bad either.
Comment by
Coldfrog on May 18, 2012 12:00pm
Now that insiders and other informed people bought about 40 million shares at 0.12 and they were then exchanges of ownership in their RSP, RSFA accounts or trusts... we should have one or two weeks of tranquility before we know the official reason as to why they wanted to stuff their pockets ..
Comment by
Coldfrog on May 23, 2012 11:16am
.........tranquility.........