Ceapro Inc V.CZO

fossi doesn't want people to talk about it.

[fossi_2002]

PROPH... How many months, even years, have you been telling us about the fantastic views from Ceapro every day?

You have completely ignored our criticism of the quarterly results, of Symrise, of the constant failure to meet timetables in the development of the pipeline.

The only thing that has increased during this time is the salaries of Gilles and Ronnie.

We shareholders have been left behind in every respect.

Now suddenly the turnaround. Our cash situation is deteriorating, the Avenanthramide trial is costing money and the PGX facilities are also costing a lot of money. - And dear Fossi is supposed to develop an alternative plan instead of a merger.

Has anyone ever heard a stupider joke?

Gilles was apparently unable to develop a business plan for CZO. This business plan certainly didn't include a merger a few months ago.

Now the alarm bells are ringing!
Who kept telling us about the great deal with Symrise? That was simply a lie!
Who told us that the decline in orders in the core business was only temporary, was that also a lie?

Your fantasy about the pipeline is completely implausible, but since it cannot be proven, you propagate it every day.

Of course, the statements of Gilles and Ronnie have to serve as proof.

Just as bad is your citing of the AEZS price target of US$15 by Wainwright. If they cut the price target to US$5 tomorrow, as has happened several times, who cares.

[prophetoffactz]

fossi, "How many months, even years, have you been telling us about the fantastic views from Ceapro every day?" You are the one, not long ago, who wanted CZO to buy back its own shares you believed in what CZO was doing so much. Now you flip-flop and try to pretend you din't want CZO investing in its own shares despite the risks of smallcap and the cash needs for the pipeline. 

[fossi_2002]

Proph...You are the one, not long ago, who wanted CZO to buy back its own shares "Not long ago" is after all more than 2 years since I discussed it with Gilles. What was the situation in November 2021: Rising profits, solid underlying business, high cash situation, no clinic trial, no high PGX investment. So why not a buyback or a dividend of 15% of profits at that time. What was wrong

[prophetoffactz]

Fossi hyped CZO's step-wise development plan for PGX  as a "MUST" and "in the right framework" less than nine months ago. For fossi it was the most promising development point as fossi promoted a potential tripling of sales towards 2026. Now the 5X scale-up is set to be commisisoned in Q1 and Natex is working on the 10X scale-up with 50% of the equipment

[Everestbaker]

Agree with you completely Fossi. Thank you for calling it out and I believe many of us who have been here will not fall for this charlatan who swamps the board with utter hopeful nonsense. If it's of any value, I agreed with your point back then about CZO buying back shares. Looking forward to this merger vote and kicking out GG - hoping Ronnie is upto task. 

[prophetoffactz]

Everestbaker, "Agree with you completely Fossi."   You agree with fossi who less than nine months ago applauded CZO's step-wise plan for PGX as the ""right" framework" and said that it was the "most promising development point" that could lead to a "rapid tripling of Ceapro's sales towards 2026". fossi, "In the whole discussion

[Everestbaker]

Like I posted, PoF/Digitel is back to spamming the board - I guess two can play a game and start replying to their own posts. Anyways, most of us long shareholders with accounts here know his/her drill. Would be curious if the post frequency stays the same after Gagnon is voted out and eventually replaced. 

[prophetoffactz]

Everestbaker, "Agree with you completely Fossi."   You agree with fossi who less than nine months ago applauded CZO's step-wise plan for PGX as the ""right" framework" and said that it was the "most promising development point" that could lead to a "rapid tripling of Ceapro's sales towards 2026". fossi, "In the whole

[Ciao]

Yes, we first need to get past this sham of a merger with a resounding NO on both CZO and AEZS shareholder votes. Then we need to stick to the original plan to vote him off the board in June and put pressure on the board to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility and have him replaced as the CEO.