Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Part of the judgement

[tylerreddick]

" Judge Acquisto also concurred with the water district that the city did not hold a scoping meeting before beginning the EIR and said that would be required before future environmental analysis. A scoping meeting allows the public and other agencies to help shape the environmental review. "

It would seem that the new EIR might not be completed in the next few weeks as some have suggested. And considering the company refuses to update their shareholders on the path forward, the only reasonable conclusion I can make is that it will take much longer to get Sage going than the cheerleaders will acknowledge.

[shneps]

If the City did not perform a scoping meeting as per the court's judgement then the "future" environmental anaysis can not be completed until its completion. The documents for the meeting need to be prepared, submitted, presented to the public through various publications, allowed for a minimum of 30 days for the public to sends opinions and then on to the responses. Two months is

[Blizzy420]

Whenever someone uses an adjective to try and ease expectations it should be a red flag.    The use of the word tiny in the Dearlol post set off some alarm bells

[shneps]

You're exactly right Blizzy. I saw another one of those recently -  "As at March 31, 2024, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $8,288,062, which includes $2.26 million in related party accounts payable and accrued liabilities in addition to $781K in loans payable from friendly parties who have not and will not demand payment until the Company has started generating

[Blizzy420]

He forgot to add "we hope" lol.    Hope is a strategy full of waiting around and doing nothing .   The true passive investment.

[Ripple1]

shneps How much $ in the till.  Do they have a line of credit or a bank loan to draw on?   Those purchases of water rights from insiders are non refundable so that's all money down the drain it looks like I never had any hope for Sage not because of water, but becuse of 8 or more other individual reasons.  I wonder what Chris Harvey is making of all this?

[tylerreddick]

Hard to understand the situation otherwise, although I sure would like to hear exactly how posters like Dearlol have come to their conclusions. But all we get is excuses and personal insults, which says everything.

[shneps]

Dearlol's post:  "Quote: Awards and Honors The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation – Environmental (2023-2024) Sacramento Magazine, Top Lawyer (2016, 2020, 2022, 2023)"   And now Carissa Beechham (GRB's Water Lawyer) Website. "Awards and Honors The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation – Environmental (2023-2024) Sacramento Magazine

[tylerreddick]

Ooops.  It appears that Dearlol should be a little more careful about what they post?