Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum IIE:CA V.IIE

TSXV:IIE - Post Discussion

IIE:CA > Questions re Agreement Hold up
View:
Post by Pennypicker4 on Apr 27, 2007 6:41am

Questions re Agreement Hold up

Can anyone provide the Board with some information as to how CSX and Ms McDonald became a 3rd party to the negotiations that are taking place? From looking at the CSX SH board there is no indication that CSX have any current projects. The only recent news relates to a stock split increasing the shares from around 12 million to 84 million(7 times). Ms McDonald is supposeably known to Chuck Fipke but obviously she or CSX would appear to have some stake in the Brazil exploration. Maybe Goose can enlighten us on this as as he must be aware of the situation or perhaps someone can get the information from Lonnie Smith at Skyline. Hopefully progress is being made on this front as it is essential for everyone concerned that the matter be resolved amicably. GLTA
Comment by jcja on Apr 27, 2007 11:13am
resolution...yes, before a "whack" of new shares hit the market; if there is no perceived value in the company.....
IIE:CA
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities