Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Majestic Gold Corp. V.MJS

Alternate Symbol(s):  MJGCF

Majestic Gold Corp. is engaged in mineral resource exploration, development and extraction. It operates the Songjiagou open pit gold mine in the eastern Chinese province of Shandong. Songjiagou Gold Mine covers over 75.04 square kilometers in Muping, Yantai, Shandong Province, China. It has four separate tenements, including E36/918, E37/1334, E63/2110 (Kumarl) Tenement and E77/2817 (Moorine... see more

TSXV:MJS - Post Discussion

Majestic Gold Corp. > Majority Shareholder Approval
View:
Post by richard45161 on Jan 23, 2023 10:47am

Majority Shareholder Approval

Hi guys,

i have a question regarding the "Majority Shareholder Approval" from MJS Shareholder nessescary to approve the IPO of Persistance. 

Must at least 50% of those participating in the voting agree or must actually 50% of all shareholders agree? What corresponds to 100% ? All who participate or all shareholders?

thank you and best
richard


https://stockhouse.com/news/press-releases/2022/03/30/majestic-announces-listing-application-to-hkex-for-ipo-of-subsidiary-sinogold 

In addition, Majestic has sought and obtained conditional approval (the "Conditional Approval") from the TSX Venture Exchange (the "TSXV"), which is conditional upon Majestic obtaining the written approval for the Proposed IPO from its arm's length shareholders holding at least 50% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Majestic (the "Majority Shareholder Approval") and the filing of the final prospectus of Sinogold and certain transaction documents relating to the Proposed IPO with the TSX-V. Majestic will seek its written Majority Shareholder Approval and intends to file the final prospectus of Sinogold and other relevant transaction documents to satisfy the other outstanding conditions of the TSX-V's Conditional Approval in due course before the launch of the Proposed IPO.#
Comment by nozzpack on Jan 23, 2023 2:25pm
arm's length shareholders exclude insiders holding 10% or more of the shares and management. There is also the question as to whether this includes beneficial shareholders or just registered shareholders ....perhaps the latter ?
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 23, 2023 2:39pm
according to the last pubilshed shareholder data, there is only 1 shareholder with more than 4,9% of issued share -> Fa. Kong with around 13% of shares. So i interpret this, that there is no other entity with more 4,9%  i will try to find something Majority Shareholder Approval. At the "normal AGM`s" the 100% equals to all the participating shareholders, not all ...more  
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 23, 2023 2:59pm
I would think that its the same for the HKEX approval? - all have the right to vote - at least 2 enties with at least 5% must participate and the participants euquals to 100% But its just my interpretation best richard * Management Information Circular https://majesticgold.com/site/assets/files/4356/2022_management_info_circular.pdf
Comment by nozzpack on Jan 23, 2023 3:46pm
That sounds like all shareholders . If that is the case,I am on the fence until the final listing terms of the IPO become available.. The way I see it, we have plenty of cash to push back pit wall #1 , exposing the much higher grades...if indeed that is not mostly completed. We don't need to fund the mill expansion to 3.3 million tons, as the doubling of the grade can be accomplished by the ...more  
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 24, 2023 3:05am
Hi, the user "latino11" in the german forum found an very interessting case: "Cancellation of Intercompany Debt needed to be  approved in writing by the arm's length shareholders holding at least 50% of the common shares of the Company" https://stockhouse.com/news/press-releases/2020/06/15/majestic-announces-cancellation-of-intercompany-debt For me, it is not clear ...more  
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 24, 2023 4:06am
HI nozzpack, i have wrote the email below to James Mackie. I want to kindly ask to consider to call him and ask hin directly about this?  thank you and best richard Dear Mr. james Mackie,   I have another question regarding the Process of the  "Majority Shareholder Approval" for the upcoming IPO.     1. "Majestic obtaining the ...more  
Comment by Value2020 on Jan 24, 2023 5:54am
Other than 1 director holding over 10%. Here is the list of private placements who can be asked to vote in favor... Total of 439.5 million shares held detials below: 1.   0.205c   51M Shares on Nov 3/2011 2.   0.20c     15M Shares on July 26/2011                     14M ...more  
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 24, 2023 6:21am
page 6: https://majesticgold.com/site/assets/files/4356/2022_management_info_circular.pdf "To the best of the knowledge and belief of the directors and senior officers of Majestic, as at the Record Date, no person beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or exercised control or direction over shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to any class of voting ...more  
Comment by Nklogix on Jan 24, 2023 9:21am
Please try to follow simple logic here... Fan Zhong Kong 133,314,714 12.79% All the other private placements 439,500,000.  These are larger shareholders but do not cross the 10% threshold therefore can not be mentioned. Add 133,314,714 to 439,500,000 we get 572,814,714, Lets assume over the years 50-60 million shares traded. MJS has VERY low volume so i doubt that number. That's still ...more  
Comment by richard45161 on Jan 24, 2023 10:12am
no problem following this logic but I don't find the conclusion convincing. We simply do not know how the process was 2020 and how the process will be this time. The case 2020 is very interessting and creates question marks, but we simply dont know. unfortunatley.... it would be decent appropriate management work to have clarity there, but we have the mgm we have.  I hope we get ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities