North American Gem Inc V.NAG

It may be slow...

[nighthawk61]

...but I've watched NAG for some time and it always seems to have solid support at the 7 to 7.5 cent mark so today I decided to get a small entry amount. We'll see what happens but if support holds like in the past this seems a decent entry point.

[Saturn4]

Dude, I've been watching NAG for about a year now ... I don't give a F#@$ about support ... that s/p needs to rise ... this is getting frustrating ...

[copious]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[steder]

this has to be one of the best lines ever....'overseen by Nag's experts who are excellent managers with major experience in mine production.'   What experience is that???   Didnt know printing paper had anything to do with mine productionI laughed at that one too, and again at your comments above re printing paper......I think, however,  that is in reference to

[lucci2005]

RC left a long time ago.  All that's left are the pumpers, the bashers, and those who still believe in NAG's potential (aka long-term shareholders).  As for RC, he's probably on the beach.  GLTA.

[Saturn4]

copious, NAG may not have to "pay up for the Sask. permits" ... rumour has it that the gov't has been seeking submissions from affected parties about possibly waiving the fees ... if those permits expire, then no work on the properties=no jobs and capital in gov't coffers ... Sask. gov't isn't stupid ... we should find out about whether the fees have been waived

[HighTest]

I heard of that, and sent in my form saying no to the waiving of the rental fees, at least until 1/2 of the work requirement has been completed. The purpose of the rent was to ensure a "use it or lose it" permitting environment. IMO, they should jack the fees to a $25 hectare work/ damage deposit like Manitoba to keep the riff-raff out and from monopolizing impossibly huge to work areas.