Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oroco Resource Corp V.OCO

Alternate Symbol(s):  ORRCF

Oroco Resource Corp. is a Canadian mineral exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in Mexico. It holds a net 85.5% interest in those central concessions that comprise 1,173 hectares (ha) (the Core Concessions) of The Santo Tomas Project, located in northwestern Mexico. It also holds an 80% interest in an additional 7,861 ha of mineral... see more

TSXV:OCO - Post Discussion

Oroco Resource Corp > Production cost comparison
View:
Post by GeneralGogol on Feb 06, 2022 3:09am

Production cost comparison

This is an analysis of cost data from the ten projects cited in my previous post and a more refined evaluation of key economic drivers in order to create a more accurate picture of where Santo Tomas’ costs will lie.

Each of the ten projects has an average grade and average cost per pound CuEq over the life on mine, as obtained from their published technical reports. Each mine’s annual ore processing rate is fixed and driven by the mill’s capacity. Multiplying annual ore processing rate by average grade will tell us how much metal is produced in the mill, and after taking into account mill losses, we can determine the CuEq recovered on an annual basis, offset by recovery rates.

When a mill processes a higher than average grade from the same ore volume over a year, more metal is produced during that year. Presuming that annual mine production costs are the same between two given years, the average production cost per pound of copper is lower in that discrete year with the higher ore grade. The reverse is true during years when lower grades are processed.

I reviewed production cost data for each of the ten projects, applied mill loss rates obtained from the respective technical reports, and scaled each project to a hypothetical 0.50% grade to see what the cost / pound would be if the mill processed a 0.50% grade for an entire year.

In the first example below, Hudbay Mason has a reported average production cost of $1.61 / pound at an average grade of 0.34 CuEq over the entire life of mine. Hudbay tells us in their PEA that the Mason project has a 90% recovery rate. In one year, the 120 ktpd mill can process 96,535,200,000 pounds of ore. 328,220,000 pounds of CuEq are produced from that volume of ore (assuming an average grade of 0.34%), and after taking into account mill losses, some 295,398,000 pounds of metal are recovered. I multiplied this quantity by the $1.61 / pound cost from Hudbay, to arrive at the an annual production cost of $475,590,000. This data is captured on the middle column.

The column on the right represents a hypothetical year during which annual production costs are the same (same amount of ore processed, energy, labor, etc.), but with a higher 0.50% average grade run through the mill for that entire year. From that higher grade, but same ore processing rate, we can calculate the pounds of metal produced, apply the recovery rate and determine the amount of metal recovered. This is calculated to be 434,408,000 pounds. The cost per pound to produce metal from the higher 0.50% grade is determined by dividing annual production costs of $475,590,000 by the 434,408,000 pounds of CuEq recovered. This works out to be $1.09 / pound.

By scaling each project’s production cost per pound to a hypothetical 0.50% grade, we can see how they compare and we can also use that historical data to estimate costs at Santo Tomas.

Each project has different average life of mine grades and different Cu recovery rates, as obtained from their different technical reports. Au, Ag, and Mo have varying recovery rates as well, but the relative losses from those additional precious metals are less significant to the overall equation. Page 10 of the Santo Tomas Technical report cites a 1992 preliminary metallurgical test suggesting that a Cu recovery of 95% was attainable. This is a positive data point for us, because the industry average is closer to 90%.

Los Andes Vizcachitas and Hudbay Rosemont have the highest per pound production costs among the group, and I have identified specific reasons at the end why I believe those projects are not comparable to Santo Tomas or to the other eight projects. These other eight projects fall within a narrower cost band, and after scaling to a 0.50% grade, the average production cost is $0.99 / pound.

Hudbay Mason

Cost / pound                      $1.61                  $1.09
Average grade CuEq         0.340%               0.50%
Tons / day                         120,000               120,000
Tons / year                        43,800,000          43,800,000
Pounds of ore per year     96,535,200,000   96,535,200,000
Annual production cost     $475,590,000      $475,590,000
Pounds CuEq produced   328,220,000         482,676,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  295,398,000         434,408,000
(90% Cu recovery)

Hudbay Constancia

Cost / pound                    $1.38                      $0.86
Average grade CuEq       0.311%                   0.50%
Tons / day                        90,000                    90,000
Tons / year                       32,850,000             32,850,000
Pounds of ore per year    72,401,400,000      72,401,400,000
Annual production cost    $267,230,000         $267,230,000
Pounds CuEq produced   225,168,000          362,007,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  193,645,000          311,326,000
(86% Cu recovery)

Josemaria
Cost / pound                    $0.89                      $0.73
Average grade CuEq       0.410%                   0.50%
Tons / day                        150,000                  150,000
Tons / year                       54,750,000             54,750,000
Pounds of ore per year    120,669,000,000    120,669,000,000
Annual production cost    $374,273,000         $374,273,000
Pounds CuEq produced   494,743,000           603,345,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  420,531,000           512,843,000
(85% Cu recovery)

Taesko Yellowhead
Cost / pound                    $1.67                      $0.97
Average grade CuEq       0.290%                   0.50%
Tons / day                        90,000                    90,000
Tons / year                       32,850,000             32,850,000
Pounds of ore per year    72,401,400,000      72,401,400,000
Annual production cost    $315,575,000         $315,575,000
Pounds CuEq produced   209,964,000           362,007,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  188,967,000           325,806,000
(90% Cu recovery)

Panaro Minerals Cotabambas
Cost / pound                    $1.22                      $1.12
Average grade CuEq        0.460%                  0.50%
Tons / day                         80,000                   80,000
Tons / year                        29,200,000            29,200,000
Pounds of ore per year     64,356,800,000     64,356,800,000
Annual production cost     $288,936,000        $288,936,000
Pounds CuEq produced    296,041,000          321,784,000
Pounds CuEq recovered   236,833,000          257,427,000
(80% Cu recovery)

Note: The mixed-oxide ore contribution reduces the average Cu recovery rate at Cotabambas to a paltry 80%. See table 1-2 in Cotabambas PEA.

McEwen Mining Los Azules
Cost / pound                    $1.28                      $1.18
Average grade CuEq       0.460%                   0.50%
Tons / day                        90,000                    90,000
Tons / year                       32,850,000             32,850,000
Pounds of ore per year    72,401,400,000      72,401,400,000
Annual production cost    $387,932,000         $387,932,000
Pounds CuEq produced   333,046,000           362,007,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  303,072,000           329,426,000
(91% Cu recovery)

Copper Mountain
Cost / pound                    $1.90                      $1.22
Average grade CuEq        0.320%                  0.50%
Tons / day                         65,000                   65,000
Tons / year                        23,725,000            23,725,000
Pounds of ore per year     52,289,900,000     52,289,900,000
Annual production cost     $270,234,000        $270,234,000
Pounds CuEq produced   167,327,000           261,449,000
Pounds CuEq recovered  142,228,000           222,232,000
(85% Cu recovery)

Candente Copper Canariaco Norte
Cost / pound                     $0.82                      $0.77
Average grade CuEq        0.470%                   0.50%
Tons / day                         95,000                    95,000
Tons / year                        34,675,000             34,675,000
Pounds of ore per year     76,423,700,000      76,423,700,000
Annual production cost     $262,138,000         $262,138,000
Pounds CuEq produced    359,191,000           382,119,000
Pounds CuEq recovered   319,680,000           340,085,000
(89% Cu recovery)

Outliers that are not comparable:

Hudbay Rosemont
Cost / pound                      $1.29                     $1.37
Average grade CuEq         0.530%                  0.50%
Tons / day                          90,000                   90,000
Tons / year                         32,850,000            32,850,000
Pounds of ore per year      72,401,400,000     72,401,400,000
Annual production cost      $396,007,000        $396,007,000
Pounds CuEq produced     383,727,000          362,007,000
Pounds CuEq recovered    306,982,000          289,606,000
(80% Cu recovery)

Note: The high strip ratio (3.7 : 1) and low copper recovery rate of 80% at Rosemont drives production cost higher. Rosemont streamed their silver at $3.90 / ounce and can not take full benefit from the silver revenue (see cash flow model Table 22-5). These factors all drive the cost per pound higher than the others.

Los Andes Vizcachitas
Cost / pound                       $1.58                    $1.43
Average grade CuEq          0.451%                 0.50%
Tons / day                           110,000                110,000
Tons / year                          40,150,000           40,150,000
Pounds of ore per year       88,490,600,000    88,490,600,000
Annual production cost       $573,815,000       $573,815,000
Pounds CuEq produced      399,093,000         442,453,000
Pounds CuEq recovered     363,174,000         402,632,000
(91% Cu recovery)

The 2019 PEA presents strip ratio data at 2 early on and then hovering around 1 for the first 30 years of life of mine as shown in Table 16.4. However, Figure 16.19 demonstrates that for every 300 tonnes per day of ore mined, they are only milling 110 tonnes. In other words, the amount of ore mined is distributed 1/3 to the mill, 1/3 to the stockpile, and 1/3 to waste. This punishes the project economics as the stockpiled ore is not processed until three decades later. Normally, this would be a strip ratio of 2.9 : 1. Since half of the unmilled ore goes to a stockpile for 32 years, this is how they report a strip ratio of 1.

Los Andes is reportedly working on completing a Pre-Feasibility Study in Q1-2022 to improve project economics. The calculated average costs of $1.58 / pound for a life of mine average grade of 0.451% is high and an outlier in the dataset. Santo Tomas will have no where near as high a strip ratio as at Vizcachitas, and presumably will not need to stockpile North Zone ore for 30 years.


Santo Tomas

We do not yet know the grade and volume of Brasiles and have just a few sundry data points from the historical South Zone drilling campaigns. The current exploration has multiple avenues at expanding grade and volume.

In my next post, I will apply the cost data to different grade scenarios to illustrate the value of Santo Tomas. I anticipate additional surprises on the upside as exploration continues. Stay tuned.

 

Comment by justus717 on Feb 06, 2022 3:19pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by pullsea on Feb 06, 2022 11:01pm
thanks so much General. Please keep it coming. Much much appreciated
Comment by coppermonster on Feb 07, 2022 2:47am
+1 Thank you General! Excellent work! Looking forward to thr next installment!!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities