RT Minerals Corp V.RTM

worth mentioning

[garland]

Depth . Almost 90% of the historical drilling did not go below 150m - most only to 100m. One very important component of  the phase two program is they will be drilling deeper ( 250m+) to match the 3-D IP survey. Looks like this may have already paid off  in the first hole of phase two with the 45m interval to 225m  - very encouraging as RTM is trying to find a deep analogy like the Kerr mine which started at 70 m but the good stuff began at 350m. Interesting to note the  intercepts from previous drill holes : Cat-09-01  7.5m @ 1.5g/t from 162.5 -170m ( includes 1.5m @13g/t ,),  Cat-09 -02 196 -197m 1.0m @ 2.25g/t and Cat 09 -03 177 -  179 m  2.15m @3.77g/t.   Will be curious to know how deep they actually drilled the first hole  - maybe down to 400m?.

[diabase1]

In referring to the 3D Chargeability Model, I notice different slices at different depths. I also notice that the Chargeability Map, superimposed on the photographic background, says 250 MSL (Mean Sea Level). I also looked at a topographic map that shows the drilling area to be on or near a 250 foot elevation contour. My take on this is, a) the 250 MSL means surface, 200 MSL means 50m deeper and