Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Spanish Mountain Gold Ltd V.SPA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SPAZF

Spanish Mountain Gold Ltd. is a Canada-based exploration-stage resource company. engaged The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company is focused on advancing its 100%-owned Spanish Mountain Gold Project in southern central British Columbia. The Spanish Mountain gold project is located about six kilometers from the village of Likely... see more

TSXV:SPA - Post Discussion

Spanish Mountain Gold Ltd > CRITICAL CRITIQUING
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Apr 13, 2021 4:29pm

CRITICAL CRITIQUING

- gold is " still " at an all time high
- a project like spa is - just sitting
- even with $1250 spot gold  - spa - still profits

- spa is already drilled out - if they dril lanymore may as well mine it by drilling it.
- if more drilling is " wished " do it after project is up n running
- drilling now - only defers project and delays up n running

- why aim for a " 1.2/million oz reserve " ?
- wil lthis enable a portion of the deposit to be ear marked for - bankable gold 
  in which to finance the project ?

Could one also place graphitics in a subsitution of - reserve ?
Yeah... if carbons are at all a potential - secondary mineral - and if at all there were
ample carbon in the deposit - i tend ot think of this as equiv to a reserve -in terms of, 
it would back the gold with additional profits... That's a potential reserve that really supports
without a financing - noose - attached.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could one readjust the - 2019 PEA ?
I think it could be reajusted - and well....
Here's the original - and below - i'll do a revised version - how i see it.
In a perfect world of course....lol.
 


.ORIGINAL 2019 - PEA - COSTS

The following table summarizes the estimated capital costs:

Direct Costs Initial Capital Cost
(C$ Million)
    Overall Site 6.7
    Open Pit Mining 70.2
    Processing Plant (including Ore Handling) 77.4
    Tailing Management Facility & Water Management 46.7
    Environmental 12.0
    On-Site Infrastructure 24.0
    Off-Site Infrastructure 17.1
Sub-Total $254.1
Indirect Costs  
   Project Indirects 58.9
   Owner’s Costs 9.3
   Contingencies 41.5
Sub-Total $109.7
Total Initial Capital Cost $363.8


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MY OWN REVISION - HOW I SEE IT....

The following table summarizes the estimated capital costs:

Direct Costs Initial Capital Cost
(C$ Million)
    Overall Site 6.7
    Open Pit Mining 10
    Processing Plant (including Ore Handling) 10
    Tailing Management Facility & Water Management 30
    Environmental 12.0
    On-Site Infrastructure 10
    Off-Site Infrastructure 0
Sub-Total $78.7
Indirect Costs  
   Project Indirects 58.9
   Owner’s Costs 0
   Contingencies 10
Sub-Total $69.9
Total Initial Capital Cost $148.6


$148/million - CAPEX - would look pretty great with $1750 gold or $1250 gold.
Especially when cost per eachounces is only - $659/oz
And.. .with 400/million outstanding shares.

But... can it look better ?
It could if... graphitics were applicalbe.

And.. even better if - warrants were dewalt with and the following
measures taken to reduce capex and indirects + warrants.


MY OWN RUN DOWN  - OWN NUMBERS - REVISED -
 
Over all site costs - same

Open pit mining    -  only $10 million reserve - rely on gold ounces coming out
                                    noneed to have all costs up front - when one is mining the gold

processing Plant  - purchase the used plant - $3.2 million - with %6.8 million - buffer
                                   for set up costs and additional machinery if applicable - upgrades

Tailings                  -  if carbons were ever brought onscene - less  waste ores in tailings
                                   justifies less costs for tailings 

Environmental     -  same.

Onsite infastructure - tad less.. .use portables.

Off site                  -  zip - no need.


INDIRECTS
Project indirects - kept same -  but... what is this ?
Owners costs     -  zip... they alreadsy have shares - less gouging.
Contingencies    - less - decided ot drop this a tad - forcesd the junior to
                                work all the hard to pull the gold and make the project work

Deal with trhe warrants + special shares...
Cleans the sharestructure up - lean + mean -
327/ million out standing or less.. if warrants are cancelled - but how.
Would they take a settlement of current values, or  ?.


It's how i see the project - streamlined -
But.... time will only tell - how they decide to shape it.

If they ... wasted all tihs time and only have a PFS  to show...
A pfs that chisels the 4.1 million ounces down to 1.2 million ounces...
And nothing else  to spice it up ?
Then... will i stay around ?
LOL

The above post is not investment advice but rather...
a post on how i envision the spa porject evoloving.

Will it happen ?
Not holding my breath...lol

Cheers....
Be the first to comment on this post