Post by
Dumbeldorfwhite on Nov 29, 2023 5:40am
It’s going to take a longggggg time I bet
To track down 25 people across two countries and convince them to come in for another exam, yikes. Why did the trial originally not plan for 18 month data is a question for the next AGM
Comment by
Legit62 on Nov 29, 2023 6:54am
I dont believe that 18 month data has anything to do with us getting BTD or AA, dont know where that logic came from???
Comment by
Dumbeldorfwhite on Nov 29, 2023 7:51am
From my understanding they do, they want ~25 patients worth of data extending out to 18 months....could be clarified
Comment by
N0taP00p on Nov 29, 2023 9:52am
@DJDawg, there's an additional step besides getting this data from the local PIs, isn't there? After each center provides the data, they have to now validate it through a central lab. All this , when they're struggling to raise money. If history repeats , we will be left with more questions than answers after the quarterly.
Comment by
N0taP00p on Nov 29, 2023 10:05am
And that's why I had mentioned Q1 "24 before as the earliest estimate for BTD. Collection of data, validation of data, compile and submit for pre-BTD, wait for approval, then compile and submit for BTD, wait for approval. All this, with limited money and the holidays in between.
Comment by
Oilminerdeluxe on Nov 29, 2023 10:39am
Most things take longer than expected with TLT. One just have to accept it.
Comment by
Pandora on Nov 29, 2023 11:57am
Thanks Eoganacht, I had looked at the Google definition but it does not answer my thinking. i.e. does this aptimer have any place in the development of a vaccine? Just wondering if the TLT vaccine group in Manitoba would get any use or benefit out of it. Clutching at straws I guess.
Comment by
Dumbeldorfwhite on Nov 29, 2023 10:44am
A few months for a company that barely has any cash