Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

hit piece on treaty creek by crux investors

[highper]

https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.tuo/teuton-resources-corp?postid=35952955

[Jetstream1281]

To the uneducated this report may seem legitimate,  To anyone with a smelting/geology, background it is pretty clearly a smear pice... CS 600, where the majority of the gold is, is not actually refractory, they completely omit the high grade hits, and act like becuase they haven't progressed to a PEA at this point that they'll never get there. EVERY company ever has been at the

[Larry60]

No doubt, as the report specifies, CS600 contains the biggest chunk of Au.  Its also the lowest grade of the deposit.. Have you read the BRC report?  "The BCR tests focused on producing a copper concentrate from CS-600 material through flotation which gave a 20% Cu concentrate (not very high) at 79.5% recovery and 25 g/t Au at 65% recovery. The other results were in line with SGS’s

[Jetstream1281]

The only thing I pay any attention to is the numbers TUD puts out, the interviews with KK, and my own knowledge....There are many out there putting a spin on things, good or bad....I ignore all of it to be honest. What I see are numbers as good or better (in most cases MUCH better) than most other properties out there....properties that aren't getting hammered or bashed despite being inferior.

[cskhurasu]

The questions raised by Crux are fundamental. Crux seems to suggest the data may not support a credible PEA. TUD needs to respond.

[Jetstream1281]

TUD has already said they will respond...when they have the information they need to do it correctly...If someone doesn't want to wait that's perfectly fine....but to suggest that it can't be taken to production before they have any information is asinine.... If Crux had qualified it by saying something like with ithe information we currently have we are not sure that this can be

[Jetstream1281]

If you read the article, a lot of what Crux mentions is incorrect...The cutoff values they mention are the lowest cutoffs in the tables....The cutoff values that Tudor themselves use in their MRE are ABOVE what Crux recommends, or right in line....not below as the article would have you believe... Here is what the article says.... Another area of concern within the MRE is the methodology and

[Jetstream1281]

More innacuracies and opposing information... As per Crux... Another area of concern within the MRE is the methodology and inputs used to calculate cut-off grades. For example, the external consultants JDS use an “internal mill’ cut-off grade excluding mining cost to drop the open pit cut-off grade. This is conceptually invalid as the mining cost will have to be incurred to make the material

[paydirtontario]

Kens got an excellent reputation  more JV deals will be happening in this sector  Yes I agree a PEA would do wonders as Rudy / SEA  and now Crux and others are spouting off nonsense