Post by
rockport1 on May 18, 2024 3:36pm
KSM MTT gives Goldstorm a 5 year headstart to catch up
KSM is currently well ahead of Goldstorm in the mine development timelines. However, keep in mind that the MTT alone will take five years to build. Goldstorm can "catch-up" several years even once the new MTT construction begins.
I would expect that it may take a couple of years to finalize a new MTT route and conduct all the geotechnical work, etc. That would imply a seven years notice before mine commissioning for KSM.
Assume for a moment that Tudor can find the limits of Goldstorm within two years, then take another two years to a PFS; another three years to a bankable FS. On the assumption that both KSM and Goldstorm eventually go forward, the startup dates could end up within a few years of each other.
Of course, this scenario is dependent on many factors, not the least that Tudor will fastrack Goldstorm at the expense of all other TC deposits. It does indicate that because KSM has progressed so slowly and has a long buildout, that the two projects are much closer in mine development timelines than it appears at this moment.
Comment by
stockzorg on May 18, 2024 3:53pm
Given the amount of time it takes to develop a mine the world will run out of both copper and silver shortly. Then things will change for both projects.
Comment by
cskhurasu on May 18, 2024 4:06pm
Rockport1, you are missing a few slots in the timeline such as obtaining an Environmental Assessment Certificate. You are looking at at least 10 years to catch up to where SEA is and at these metal prices they will be well into production. Take baby steps first...a PEA that works economically.
Comment by
Jetstream1281 on May 20, 2024 12:01am
Keep in mind that brucejack was started at relatively the same time as KSM....it wouldn't take too long if the powers that be want it to.
Comment by
Galaxym31 on May 20, 2024 10:40am
Is there a Brucejack about to be uncovered in the NE of GS ?