Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Wintergreen Advisers Writes Directors of Coca-Cola, Berkshire Hathaway

KO

Wintergreen Advisers today released the following letter, which was sent to the directors of The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) and Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B). In the letter, Wintergreen states its belief that the Boards’ recent actions are utterly inconsistent with the well-defined fiduciary duties that they owe to their respective shareholders.

______________________________________________________________________________

Board of Directors
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
3555 Farnam St.
Omaha, NE 68131

Board of Directors
The Coca-Cola Company
One Coca-Cola Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30313

May 7, 2014

Dear Board Members,

Over the past six weeks, Wintergreen Advisers has raised a number of serious issues regarding the excessive nature of Coca-Cola's 2014 Equity Plan. As we have stated in numerous communications, we believe the plan materially dilutes shareholders and allows senior management to reap outsized rewards just for showing up. All of this is well-known. Perhaps less well-known, and potentially more troubling, however, are the corporate governance issues that emerged during the course of Coca-Cola's proxy solicitation period and shortly thereafter.

Recently, we learned that (i) not a single Coca-Cola Director voted against the plan that ultimately garnered support from less than half of Coca-Cola's total outstanding shares, (ii) Coca-Cola pushed through the plan over the objections of its largest shareholder, and (iii) Warren Buffett disapproved of the plan, but did not want to speak out for fear of embarrassing Coca-Cola. We find all of this very troubling and indicative of major corporate governance issues, both at Coca-Cola and at Berkshire Hathaway.

Corporate governance has been very much in the news this proxy season. SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar put it very well in an April 2014 speech in which he stated that for investors, corporate governance "means that the owners of the company are those who have paid to own the company's stock, and that management are merely their employees[.] . . . But even the most capable management, left unchecked can make bad decisions [and that] is why shareholders elect a board of directors to represent their interests. . . . Good corporate governance helps shareholders and their representatives to hire the right managers, and helps make sure that the managers remember they ultimately answer to shareholders. Additionally, good corporate governance also helps to remind the company's directors that they work for the company's shareholders, not for themselves, and certainly not for management." (emphasis added) As Commissioner Aguilar noted in his speech, these concepts are not new, and the duties of loyalty and due care owed by corporate directors have been well-developed over time in Delaware and other state courts. In the context of a proxy solicitation, good corporate governance and a board's adherence to its fiduciary duties means that directors disclose all material information within their control when they seek shareholder action.

In light of the events surrounding Coca-Cola's annual meeting and the passage of the excessive 2014 Equity Plan, we believe that the directors of both Coca-Cola and Berkshire Hathaway would do well to study Commissioner Aguilar's words. Indeed, we believe their recent actions are utterly inconsistent with the well-defined fiduciary duties that they owe to their respective shareholders. The Coca-Cola Directors never should have approved such an excessive plan. Furthermore, upon learning of the dearth of shareholder support for the plan, the Directors should have withdrawn the plan or firmly committed to scaling back its implementation. In Berkshire Hathaway's case, we believe the Directors had a duty to represent the best interests of their shareholders, even if doing so would embarrass their cronies.

Overall, we love Coca-Cola as a company. Our clients have owned Coca-Cola shares for more than five years and we believe that good corporate governance could unlock a great deal of value for shareholders. However, as recent events have demonstrated, instituting good corporate governance is difficult, if not impossible, at a company that ignores its shareholders.

Regards,

David Winters, CEO
Wintergreen Advisers, LLC
973-263-4500

Cc: Muhtar Kent
Herbert A. Allen
Ronald W. Allen
Ana Botin
Howard G. Buffett
Richard M. Daley
Barry Diller
Helene D. Gayle
Evan D. Greenberg
Alexis M. Herman
Robert A. Kotick
Maria Elena Lagomasino
Donald F. McHenry
Sam Nunn
James D. Robinson III
Peter V. Ueberroth
Jacob Wallenberg

Warren E Buffett
Charles M. Munger
Howard G. Buffett
Stephen B. Burke
Susan L. Decker
William H. Gates III
David S. Gottesman
Charlotte Guyman
Donald R. Keough
Thomas S. Murphy
Ronald L. Olson
Walter Scott, Jr.
Meryl B. Witmer



Get the latest news and updates from Stockhouse on social media

Follow STOCKHOUSE Today