Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alabama Graphite Corp. Com ABGPF



GREY:ABGPF - Post by User

Comment by micromanageron Jan 04, 2015 4:42pm
154 Views
Post# 23284268

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Myths in the industry & ALP secret weapon to convince Tesla!

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Myths in the industry & ALP secret weapon to convince Tesla!Hi Doc I think your analysis of Focus and Mason may not be exactly correct.  Yes Focus and Mason have the highest initial cg grade ranging between 10% and 15% but of that what is actually economic?   I'm thinking off the top of my head but I believe Focus initial optimized results were about 95% but only on less than 15% and their deposit contains sulphites which makes the overall cost to get to 99% much more expensive and less environmentally friendly.    I don't think Mason has even released those optimized figures meaning it would be even lower.  So if Focus has 15% initial but only 14% is economic what does that mean - means for every 1000 tonnes of rock they get 150 tonnes of graphite but only 14% of that 150 tonnes of graphite is acutally economic.  Therefore 22 tonnes of the original 1000 tonnes of rock excavated from the mine site ultimately produces 22 tonnes of 95% purity selling for $1500 tonne.   If Alabama has 1000 tonnes of rock average of 3.5% initial that's 35 tonnes of graphite however with the latest metalurgy results a majority of that is over 94%.  Therefore its looking like the actual end result is that Alabama will produce more economic graphite per tonne then Focus and Mason.  But we have to wait for the PEA to prove out that theory.  In answer to both your questions below is 1) yes they are trying to improve the coosa quality now and 2) yes Bama is approx 1200 concentrated acres of which a large portion  has not been explored except by air and land geophysical and that in itself would make a mine that would last 15 to 20 years.  I don't want to sound like a promoter although full disclosure I'm huge long in this stock and will continue to buy more on cost average but when I crunch all the numbers I keep getting the same answer - ALP has an excellent deposit coupled with more importantly the best location in North America.  And with Tesla and all the other graphite technologies in the USA coming to market I think the graphite space and the better quality companies in it will have a solid bull run stronger than in the past coming. Just don't know when      
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>