RE:RE:RE:RE:How about we be supportive?Rockport,
The irony here is that I really like the potential of TUO as well. I really like it!
It just pisses me off when shareholders are attacking one another instead of channelling that energy into the bigger cause. Is that really what these boards are for? Wouldn't it be far better to have new potential investors see unity and support for the JV and its 3 partners instead of "buy this one, but not that one"? You put a ton of time into promoting TUO on the AMK board, and have for a long time. And, you do have a negative view of AMK. Fine, but why spend all that energy like this?
Both AMK and TUO are positioned to do very well. They are very different companies though with differing potential upsides, different strengths, different histories, and in my mind differing reasons to hold a position in each. Yes, both are part of the Treaty JV, and both hold 20% interests, but the dymanics are very different. And perhaps the upside will also prove different for each. Only time will tell as to how it all pans out but both offer considerable upside in my opinion. So let's promote the project as a whole? OK?
I am in full agreement that Treaty, that was already a monster, just became a much more attractive monster deposit. Big upside potential. Still very unappreciated by the market. And under constant attack from the shorts and now the Seabridge gang. Let's support each other.