Aleafia Health Inc ALEAF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Aleafia's current traget is $1.42 :)

[Toweringmars]

The stark reality of financing in this sector. I would imagine its what keeps alot of retails away from it for now. Not to mention alot of the big corps. (not that they need worry too much about that if they're providing the dough - so to speak). But I'm sure Constallations doesnt like that big red mark on their balance sheet. 

Its nice to have money, especially in this sector. But to what end? I mean, I would imagine it doesnt matter in the long run if the sharks make their money in the interim. But its the retails that get fleeced in all of this.

1 vote for ToweringMars and the Rhinocerous party = 1 vote closer to financial freedom.
I also promise not to keep any of the promises I've made thus far... But is that a double negative? You decide.

 

stocktracker101 wrote: Now does everyone understand why I was so pissed about the financing and what I meant about stripping the warrant and hedging their bets?

If Aleafia does one more raise, I will hunt management down myself.. LOL

Here is the net negative positions of the underwritters since May 8, the day the raise was announced.. NOT 1 is NET POSITIVE.. I guess thats just a coincidence..

Annonymous (-11,149,324)
Cannacord (-727,209)
Raymond James (-458,753)
Mackie Research (-193,395)
PI Financial (-196,957)
Leede Jones (-76,100)

BMO (+2,784,386) Not allowed to play games at BMO

LOL.. Good job on the financing boys...
Way to keep the preditorial shorts away... LOL
The big M gave it to you and us with out vaseline


 

Toweringmars wrote:

HAHAHAHAHA thanks!! I knew someone out there had it! 
I wrote a letter to Fischer Price asking they add it to the dashboard but no-one got back to me.

Now if you could just post this several times an hour, I'd be ever greatful.

Fkn Cannacord. I mean, it isnt suprising to see half the jokers that took part in the last financing on the negative side. But they're more than double the runner up. That or they've been dripping some of their old shares and holding the compensation warrants at 0.65. Though I doubt its that simple.

The Offering was led by Eight Capital on behalf of a syndicate of underwriters including Canaccord Genuity Corp., BMO Capital Markets, Leede Jones Gable Inc., Raymond James Ltd., Mackie Research Capital Corp., and PI Financial Corp. (together, the “Underwriters”).

I mean, not that it matters, as we all know why we're here. But it does get a tad boring to watch it trade sideways in such a tight range for so long. Especially when you've run low on dry powder.

Oneday, when I'm prime minister, I'm going to make sure this predatory lending scheme stops.

 

stocktracker101 wrote: Towering, here is the data you cheap pr!ck.. lol

Historical net house positions since Aug 1, 2020 to present (Oct 21, 2020)

Top 7 Negative

033 Cannacord (-1,419,414 shares) 
079 CIBC (-694,982 shares)
089 Raymond James (-452,373)
019 Desjardins (-123,231)
062 Haywood Sec (-100,900)
009 BMO Nesbit (-80,970)
083 Mackie Res (-67,713)

Top 8 Positive

007 TD Securities + 614,201 shares
072 Credit Suiss + 560,915 shares 
013 Instinet + 438,482
001 Anonymous + 387,445
002 RBC Capital + 286,805
085 Scotia Capital + 274,234
080 National + 241,640
053 Margan Stanley + 186,582














 

 

Toweringmars wrote:

I WANT NAMES!!!! 
TD 007- you SOB, We're watching you.

On another note, I'm also trading under TD. BUT IT ISNT ME! I wouldnt do y'all dirty like that.

Jokes aside, it would be nice to have the 'House" consolodation numbers. But I'm too cheap to subscribe to CEO.ca. I think they offered them.

They show 1 - 3 month trailing data on net house positions. So we can see who's net short, or long, and see if houses have been accumulating or covering or not. Might be indicative to a move in the near future?
 

 

stocktracker101 wrote: Someone out of td dumped some shares this morning. That's ok. That's why it's nice to put some bids in just below trading. From what I gather from the price action, short sellers are covering slowly but there hasnt been much pressure on them at the .54/share mark. If it continues in this range, they'll be able to cover but it will take a while with this volume. If some buying comes in and pushes it above .54, I think this could climb to .57/.60 quick after. Short sellers put in walls to block the the share price from rising so that they can cover slowly just below those walls as cheap as possible. Anyone selling below the walls they put in is doing them a favour. PS. cant wait for the results of this harvest..

 

fleamarket wrote:

penismightier wrote: This some kind of bidding war? Sounds good to me. Pen.

fleamarket wrote:

fleamarket wrote:

1hot-techwoman wrote: https://ca.investing.com/equities/auracle-resources-ltd-consensus-estimates

funny enough. Moreover 8 to 12$

or 14+$

 

Volumes keeper meaning Allo but we did have for the uptick the other day. Raises a couple questions