RE: The official rebuttalIt has been agreed that the LATAM properties and facilities do indeed exist and that the value is within an accepable price range even though considered to be at the high end of that range..The reason that V.N. as well as the two founding partners are being kicked out is because they failed to disclose that they had a conflict of interest by being involved on both the seller ( LATAM) and buyer (APHRIA) side of the deal. As a result ,in my opinion, this was NOT an arms lenght transaction. I question whether the securities company who gave the fairness opinion on this deal was aware of the conflict. In addition i think that all three parties, with the conflict, should be forced to return their profits on this deal back to the company!!!