Post by
juneau103 on Mar 08, 2021 9:07am
Remember, this IS the company....
where most if not all the insiders sold all their or most of their stock on the way to a buck.....two years ago.....so while they were promoting the stock, they sold it to those that bought stock all the way up......
Lotus Bank of Canada........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK-yc-wwyKg
J 103 So, ask your self, is this a management team you can trust? What will stop them from doing it again......NOTHING! Be fore warned!!!
Comment by
DOOMSDAY79 on Mar 14, 2021 3:29am
Lotus is a cocktail of corrupt mamagement and garbage insiders.
Comment by
Edcando on Mar 14, 2021 6:18pm
Omg then maybe doomsday really is coming?!
Comment by
AngusHung on Mar 16, 2021 10:46am
It is very sad but true, Dale and Carl both need to hit the road. They both bring nothing to the table except there corrupt ideas of how to get ritch.
Comment by
colgen on Mar 16, 2021 8:31pm
They bring nothing to the table except ... very low cost production, consistent harvests, selling all stock to date, and steadily improving financials based on those fundamentals? If you're that pissed off at ownership then sell your stake, I'm sure there will be takers to pick it up and you wouldn't need to stress any longer.
Comment by
undervalue on Mar 18, 2021 12:17am
Way too much for a business so small. They don't like what they were getting, they can go elsewhere. Especially Dale, he is easily replaceable.
Comment by
coolwm082 on Mar 18, 2021 4:53pm
They certainly are doing their job. They may have taken lower salaries but they certainly cashed in on their shares. That was the reason I got out was all the insider selling. Year after year bringing in investors through the front door while Steve was loading out the back door into the trunk of his car. Alas I took a beating but was free from the insider selling and short attacks.
Comment by
colgen on Mar 19, 2021 2:32pm
Points taken, thanks for the reply. AGM results were sent out in Feb via email to their investors mail list subscription - after reading the email from them again I'll retract the "overwhelmingly" part of my comment (as I had misremembered the way they phrased it), but I'll still stand by the essence of the statement of the voters supporting them.