Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR



CSE:MWR - Post by User

Comment by MTStackon Feb 17, 2023 9:07am
68 Views
Post# 35291714

RE:RE:Newgold is wrong again, as usual

RE:RE:Newgold is wrong again, as usualNewgold, I agree that it does not matter what I think or say, just as it does not matter what you think or say.  Nor does it matter if Barrick ever mines Pascua Lama – a bit of disinformation on which you have hung your hat for years.  The only things that matter are what the courts of Chile and British Columbia decide and what evidence has been shown to be valid.
 
You have spent years pretending that you have secret inside information on the happenings of the JL/MSX lawsuits when all you do is echo misinformation, misinterpretation and fantasies from JL and Johnson.  Johnson’s position hearing was full of such false statements:
 
1.            That the Amarillo Norte and Amarillo Sur claims were mining concessions.
2.            That not all of the Amarillo Norte and Amarillo Sur claims were legally cancelled.
3.            That HUL stated in C 1912-2001 that he “knew nothing about Barrick Gold Corporation       whatsoever”.
4.            That JL holds title.
5.            That JL controls the Tesoro claims.
6.            That JL held “absolute title” during the time period under review by the BCSC.
7.            That the records of trials were not available to Mr. Ossa because they are archived.
8.            That the 2006 verdict in C 1912-2001 was not annulled.
 
… plus, other statements that showed that BJ didn’t have a firm grasp of the facts.  He didn’t even know the date that the Appeals Court verdict was issued.
 
The Chilean courts have determined that JL has no title to any concessions.  British Columbia has determined, based upon the Chilean court findings, that Johnson issued false and misleading information, which was upheld by the BC Appeals Court. 
 
You stated that “the mental midget (referring to JL) does have TITLES as they have been submitted,” and I have proved you were wrong by showing you exactly where in the court records to find the titles that had been put into evidence – which Juan Torres recognized had never been owned by JL.
 
I know my opinion does matter, but I will make the following predictions based upon the evidence so far submitted to the Courts:
 
  • Neither the Supreme Court of Canada nor the Interamerican Commission of Human Rights will consider overturning the MSX/BJ sanctions.  <snork>
  • That all criminal and civil trials against Ossa/Claro will be dismissed/rejected.
  • That the libel trial against CMN will be rejected.
  • That C 3784-2016 (JL’s lawsuit to annul the Villar sale) will be rejected if it ever is revived.  It has been over three years since anything of consequence has happened.
 
You can make your own predictions, and we can compare.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>