RE:READ THE NR AGAINwhatdoiknow123 wrote: Absolute BS. If the results were good, it would be obvious and they would have been published today. The delay points to something very different indeed.
Wrote Mikey H, a genuinely helpful chap who appeared recently, along with some friends of his, to help us out and point out how corrupt Sona is.
Read the NR.
1. It seems obvious that they will already have some initial feedback on the results.
2. Before releasing the results they will need to digest them in their entirety and produce a report suitable to MRI,FDA,HC etc.
3. The new clinical trials are quite complex(just read the format in which the submission has to be made to the FDA) and will take time to formulate.
4. If they had been made aware of any significant problems with the results that would be MATERIAL NEWS and they would need to release that as soon as they are aware of it.
5. Sona say in the NR that the data from the trials WILL be used in the submissions to HC and FDA. Not MIGHT or MAY but WILL.
6. They could not say that if they were aware of any problems that would make a submission impossible which means, I believe, that they know they have achieved the minimum sensitivity necessary to allow a submission.
I am sure we will have good news soon ( although I honestly believe that the NR today is good news if you read it carefully and between the lines).
It's absolutely good news. You are correct they used "will" If results were not good they would not submit them.
Plus we learned Sona is going after another FDA HC approval for their GNR's to be used INVIVO drug delivery... That is the secret sauce.. Their GNR's can be ingested.. All kinds of uses.. a Disruptive tech for the whole testing industry... They are good.. we are good.. Share price is up already... GLTA