RE:RE:RE:RE:REVIEWMoemoney42 wrote: LOL... yup there's hope for everyone I suppose.. I'd like to know why you go silent when posters post non truths/BS but the minute somone posts something that's not aligned with the positive stance you're all over them... kind of a double standard wouldn't you say..? You gotta admit there have been MANY posts here claiming things that are NOT TRUE to be fair. whatdoiknow123 wrote: Moemoney,
I much prefer it when you put your reasonable face on, there´s hope for you yet.
I take your point on possible Saudivax investment in Sona but doubt it. The Saudis invest big and I think any investment they might have made would have been notifiable. It would also almost certainly have had to be declared in some fashion in the Approval submission process.
I do not say that the licensing partnership is likely but it is an intriguing prospect.
I´m not here to contradict peoples´ opinions or outrageous SP speculation either high or low, they´re entitled to them. What I do repond to is false claims for competitor or alternative products or to correct or explain technical or medical aspects of testing which IN MY OPINION are misleading. I don´t claim to know everything in this field but I do have certain experience in this speciality which does give me an advantage in certain respects.
There certainly are many posts that are not true and on both sides, but I would honestly say that there are multiples of posts that are posting negative posts based on false or biased opinion in comparison to the positive ones. Obviously I´m biased as I firmly believe in the Sona product, the logic of its´use and the potential but the positive posters are generally here long-term and consistent. In contrast several new negative posters appear suddenly, post incessant negative comments and then disappear, only ocassionaly to reappear. That is not a coincidence and I believe that, while many are shorters, more are attempting to deflate the price to create buying opportunities.