Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sona Nanotech Inc C.SONA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNANF

Sona Nanotech Inc. is a nanotechnology life sciences company that has developed multiple methods for the manufacturing of various types of gold nanoparticles. The Company is engaged in the research and development of its technology for use in multiplex diagnostic testing platforms and biomedical applications. Its gold nanotechnologies are adapted for use in applications, as a safe and delivery... see more

CSE:SONA - Post Discussion

Sona Nanotech Inc > The truth about discordant NML results
View:
Post by oxinos on Dec 03, 2020 6:44am

The truth about discordant NML results

They used heat treated viral samples. The link I post will shed light on this. Please read also the comments by some on this revelation. Especially read the comments by The-Modern-Age.

https://twitter.com/Mod3rnAge/status/1333435939507539969?s=20

It's unbelievable that Canada's National Microbiology Lab heat treated the specimens and then expected Sona's lateral flow test to detect dead or mostly dead virus in the Specimens.
Comment by TheeRook on Dec 05, 2020 4:35pm
It standard testing procedure to dtermione the LOD,  that is used by the FDA also. Just face it with all these better Antigen tests being apporved by the FDA , it is no wonder they are not wasting time on the SONA Test  with 84/90 % Analytical Sensitivity: Limit of Detection (LoD) The LoD for direct swab was established using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 isolate USAWA1/2020 (NR-52286) ...more  
Comment by igold8 on Dec 05, 2020 6:27pm
What does this mean can you summarize please I'm not technical thanks
Comment by TheeRook on Dec 05, 2020 7:24pm
 It means SONA is posting BS for their reason to pull out of the HC applaication. SONA is not telling the whole story on why   the virus is heat treated or in the Case of the example from the FDA  EUA for AccessBIo  they call it   using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 isolate. Obviously the heat is going to inactivate the Virus.  Is only part of the story on ...more  
Comment by Pandora on Dec 05, 2020 10:37pm
"with all these better Antigen tests being apporved by the FDA" Seems to me that was a very short list of "all these better" the last time I saw the FDA approvals on Antigen.
Comment by TheeRook on Dec 06, 2020 1:55am
 Seven AG tests now approved and more in queue.  Not a lot of excess production capacity, so takes time to build up new production.   BinaxNOW, Abbott 50 million tests per month beginning in October.  Quidel, which was manufacturing 2.1 million tests a week in early October, aims to ramp up production to nearly 6 million tests a week by mid-2021 BD is leveraging ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities