Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD



GREY:ESOFD - Post by User

Alpha Minerals Inc > Patterson Lake - feasibility
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by Tinmannon Feb 08, 2013 11:45am
268 Views
Post# 20958884

RE: Patterson Lake - feasibility

RE: Patterson Lake - feasibility

Most uranium deposits are under lakes actually. Roughrider was/is almost entirely under a lake. Patterson Lake is shallow, maybe 15 feet or so in the area of interest, so it would be a simple open pit with dams on either side.

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities