Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD

GREY:ESOFD - Post Discussion

Alpha Minerals Inc > Canaccord Statement
View:
Post by Presclubs on Nov 22, 2013 11:59pm

Canaccord Statement

I can't even describe what useless and incompetent release this is from Canaccord.  Not only is it blatantly inaccurate, my opinion is it reaks of ulterior motives.  Not only is their pounds estimate completely off, their statement of trying to link this litigation to the difference in the price of the companies is ridiculous as the difference has always been there.  You can't call yourself a professional investment bank analyst, and put out such garbage.  I also don't believe that they don't know this.  As all posters are not known, I believe that some that post on this site work for Canaccord and use this. I don't know anything, but that's my opinion.  Some of the post are just a little too convenient.

I may have more on this on Sunday, just had to post this.

Cheers

Presclubs
Comment by $tarbuxxonPender on Nov 24, 2013 11:28am
Can anyone post Dahrouge counter claim? I`ve been told the content but haven`t seen it. Interesting that Stockwatch Streetwire never mentioned it even though they make a big deal on the origional "lawsuit"
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Nov 24, 2013 12:08pm
@$tarbuxxon - Pages E-38-39 in Fission's information circular, and page E-37 in Alpha's.
Comment by battleready on Nov 24, 2013 7:16pm
"Devinder Randhawa, Fission Uranium Corp., Fission Energy Corp. and Denison Mines Corp. are the defendants by way of counterclaim." No mention of the Spinco in the lawsuit. The counterclaim is against Dension as well. Posters on this board say this is not material. You you kidding? How does the Spinco imdemnify on this claim? "breaches of British Columbia ...more  
Comment by losecash on Nov 24, 2013 8:27pm
This will have no effect on the pls property.
Comment by letsgetready on Nov 24, 2013 10:19pm
Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill Battle. It's not material. The real issue is if this guy "stole" FCU's opportunities/properties. If he didn't he'll get to keep them. If he did fcu spinco will get them. Stop stirring s**t. 
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Nov 24, 2013 10:23pm
@battleready - Not sure how many times you need things explained to you but if Dahrouge's countersuit is successful, and it is an if, then he would be idemnified by receiving unemcumbered title to the 8 property claims that Fission has taken an action against him to recover.  Just because Dahrouge is attempting to defend himself by way of countersuit, it doesn't mean that Dahrouge can ...more  
Comment by battleready on Nov 24, 2013 7:09pm
Good point. Simple answer, Fission is probably a client of Stockwatch. Companies do pay stockwatck for services. Also Fission is a client of stockhouse.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities