GREY:GMFLF - Post by User
Comment by
hazardpayon Mar 19, 2015 6:25am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0340-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
162 Views
Post# 23537251
RE:RE:Antimony
RE:RE:AntimonyThey also need to deal with the Antimoy issue to become more profitable. From the PEA:
"For the Strieborná calcine product, these terms result in a penalty of $1,103/dmt, with
$1,004 of that being the antimony penalty. With over $1,000/t in penalties predicted for antimony alone, the importance of antimony removal steps in the Strieborná metallurgical flowsheet are readily apparent."
And
"Opportunity: On-site processing to create a marketable antimony product could also allow for
relatively cheap mercury removal.Could turn antimony from smelter charge into a revenue stream. Could allow for cheaper mercury removal than assumed at this point."
Regarding furthermore that some Chinese producers of Antimony are planning to shut down within the next months and a current supply squeeze in the European Antimony market is observable dealing with the Antimony in a positive way is essential and the sole possibility for running a lucrative business. Thus, it seems like Antimony or die. I guess they will chose the Antimony.