PINL:GRPOF - Post by User
Comment by
BBDAeroEngon Jul 02, 2018 5:09pm
147 Views
Post# 28259751
RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affair
RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affairgkmackdadzzz1 wrote: gkmackdadzzz1 wrote: stocktickler87 wrote:
Wrong again Gkmack. I'm enjoying watching you make a fool of yourself. That's like saying codeine replaces the need for morphine in hospitals. Tested potent product with a full DIN just became legit and more valuable.
are you even reading the link I posted. Comprehension fails you yet again. Let me highlight the main point into that article. and then you got back to non-linear discussion about a dream DIN.
”
The Ontario College of Pharmacists now says “it does not oppose any federal or provincial legislation that would permit the dispensing of non-smoked forms of cannabis for medical use within pharmacies.” “NON-SMOKED FORMS” Tetra’s beloved $12M$+ PPP0001 is a smoked product and they are gonna have a tough time getting a DIN without these guys supporting a combustible product.
How exactly am I not understanding that this Ppp0001 thing is not the biggest waste of shareholder equity?
Furthermore, did you happen to read it thru to this point...
”
However, he noted the agency may have gone too far in banning smoked medical cannabis, which he calls a “major challenge” as most military veterans consume combustible MMJ.” ”BANNING SMOKED CANNABIS”.
The sky is most certainly falling
Please read what you just quoted/wrote
it says that the agency may have gone to far in banning smoked medical cannabis . This leaves the door open to possibly unbanning smoked cannabis.
the article says that the agency does not oppose non-smoked forms of cannabis. No where does it say that the agency opposes smoked cannabis.
everyone also please realize that there are actually 3 categories of cannabis; pharma, medicinal, and recreational.
medicinal and recreational cannabis is essentially the same exact thing.
ignore the bashers because most of their so called facts and proof against TBP are actually against medicinal cannabis NOT pharmaceutical cannabis. There's a difference.