Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Traxion Sab De Cv Ord Shs GRPOF

Grupo Traxion SAB de CV is a Mexico-based company engaged in the transportation sector. The Company provides logistics services within eight business areas: Fright, including intermodal and multimodal services, door-to-door, national and cross-border distribution, among others; Integrated logistics, including logistics management, aerial and maritime services and custom transportation support services; Warehousing, including dedicated storage, shared warehouses, packing and value-added services, such as labeling and products assembly; Logistics systems, including software for logistics management; Passenger transportation, including transportation of personnel and students; Special services, including rental of bus and vans; Moving, including national and international moving services, and Advertising, including custom transportation services during marketing campaigns. The Company operates through a number of group companies.


PINL:GRPOF - Post by User

Comment by Chuck03on Jul 02, 2018 5:25pm
99 Views
Post# 28259794

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affair

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affairFew dollars more? Free vs a few dollars: one is more expensive than the other.
Crazyfrog1 wrote: Maybe low grade was a bad choice of words. Just that there is new hybrid strains being developed every month which have a variety of different qualities that are much better. Customers will explore and try these varieties regardless of cost especially for a few dollars moreu.  
Chuck03 wrote: Low grade strain? Where is the evidence? Now I know your are full of it.
Crazyfrog1 wrote: I have to agree with you gkmack. The initial thought of this smokeable pellet and TBPs perseverance on the hype of getting a DIN on a certain low grade strain was slim to none. Now , that pharmacies will not oppose smokeabke weed coupled with the huge discounts on oversupply and variety I see very little upside on sales on the remote chance they do get a DIN. Don’t see people flocking for the product to save a couple dollars especially when it’s something they don’t want.  As far as oils and ingestibles , there are many on cutting edge delivery via time release and bioavailability. This isn’t a Pharma play nor a weed play. Probably wise to stay clear of this investment.      
gkmackdadzzz1 wrote:
stocktickler87 wrote:


Wrong again Gkmack. I'm enjoying watching you make a fool of yourself. That's like saying codeine replaces the need for morphine in hospitals. Tested potent product with a full DIN just became legit and more valuable.


are you even reading the link I posted. Comprehension fails you yet again. Let me highlight the main point into that article. and then you got back to non-linear discussion about a dream DIN.

The Ontario College of Pharmacists now says “it does not oppose any federal or provincial legislation that would permit the dispensing of non-smoked forms of cannabis for medical use within pharmacies.”

“NON-SMOKED FORMS” Tetra’s beloved $12M$+ PPP0001 is a smoked product and they are gonna have a tough time getting a DIN without these guys supporting a combustible product. 

How exactly am I not understanding that this Ppp0001 thing is not the biggest waste of shareholder equity?
 

 






<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>