PINL:GRPOF - Post by User
Comment by
Chuck03on Jul 02, 2018 5:25pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0341-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
99 Views
Post# 28259794
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affair
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sharp dagger to the heart of the PPP001 - DIN affairFew dollars more? Free vs a few dollars: one is more expensive than the other.
Crazyfrog1 wrote: Maybe low grade was a bad choice of words. Just that there is new hybrid strains being developed every month which have a variety of different qualities that are much better. Customers will explore and try these varieties regardless of cost especially for a few dollars moreu.
Chuck03 wrote: Low grade strain? Where is the evidence? Now I know your are full of it.
Crazyfrog1 wrote: I have to agree with you gkmack. The initial thought of this smokeable pellet and TBPs perseverance on the hype of getting a DIN on a certain low grade strain was slim to none. Now , that pharmacies will not oppose smokeabke weed coupled with the huge discounts on oversupply and variety I see very little upside on sales on the remote chance they do get a DIN. Don’t see people flocking for the product to save a couple dollars especially when it’s something they don’t want. As far as oils and ingestibles , there are many on cutting edge delivery via time release and bioavailability. This isn’t a Pharma play nor a weed play. Probably wise to stay clear of this investment.
gkmackdadzzz1 wrote: stocktickler87 wrote:
Wrong again Gkmack. I'm enjoying watching you make a fool of yourself. That's like saying codeine replaces the need for morphine in hospitals. Tested potent product with a full DIN just became legit and more valuable.
are you even reading the link I posted. Comprehension fails you yet again. Let me highlight the main point into that article. and then you got back to non-linear discussion about a dream DIN.
”
The Ontario College of Pharmacists now says “it does not oppose any federal or provincial legislation that would permit the dispensing of non-smoked forms of cannabis for medical use within pharmacies.” “NON-SMOKED FORMS” Tetra’s beloved $12M$+ PPP0001 is a smoked product and they are gonna have a tough time getting a DIN without these guys supporting a combustible product.
How exactly am I not understanding that this Ppp0001 thing is not the biggest waste of shareholder equity?