RE:30% is correctThe math works for GEN1 being 14% stronger than benchmark graphite and then GEN2 being 14% stronger than GEN1.
But you don't get that second 14% based on the information presented in the graph of yesterday's news release, nor do you get that direct 30% based on the information presented in the graph.
Average of 3 batteries:
Graphite 2,775
GEN1 3,174
GEN2 3,379
May 16 news release:
Graphite 2,780
GEN1 3,150
GEN2 3,610
14% and 14% indirectly and 30% directly works for the May 16 news release. But it does not work for yesterday's which would be 14% and 6% indirectly and 22% directly.
As described, the last news release presents information in the way that the overall conclusions on improvement are not supportable. It is that simple, it is not a 30-page research paper where a reader could miss things, it is not a log graph that people may not understand. The video tried to close the loop by making a distinction between yesterday's being an "average" as opposed to May 16 being the "maximum". If that is the case, the above information shows that there is much more variation in GEN2 material right now than there is in Graphite and GEN1.
Continue on with the optimizing, present future information more clearly because manufacturers and clients that will have experts that know much more than us will have tougher questions and observations.