Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

bobby

[zeus55]

Salmon shorted and have to cover around $2.30? That makes no sense. And it is Salman, not Salmon.

[oullins]

I agree with Bobby, that Salmon sorry Salman company is fishy!   LOL   We have to keep a sense of humor.   Mart is a great stock to trade for traders.  I am a value investors and Mart or stocks like PTQ are great value.  SP will meet value at some point.  Yes Mart will be $3.00 and even higher.  In the mean time I am getting a huge dividend compared

[themangokid]

haha. Salmon.  I wonder what goldfish sachs thinks about mmt?   yeah, "buying more to get a bigger reward".  are you still buying more oilexco and vast shares, bobby?   disclosure: patiently long on mmt

[zeus55]

"Mart or stocks like PTQ are great value" Unfortunately, PTQ hasn't been doing that great lately either.   "In the mean time I am getting a huge dividend compared to my share cost" Also unfortunately, not every one has such a low share cost. I don't imagine those who bought over $2 are quite as pleased.   But I do agree that MMT could be a $3 stock one day

[Claired]

You are right, the people who bought over $2 are not happy with Mart's performance right now. When they annouce that they are producing more oil via the new pipeline it will go up.  If they announce they are aquiring new fields, then it will go way up.  It's always been the case with mart that the price reflects what they are currently producing or some announcement. A lot of

[zeus55]

"I agree with Bobby, that Salmon sorry Salman company is fishy!" I hate to say it, but you just lost a bit of credibility. You are the one who suggested that bsmark was writing for Salman, and bobby was parroting that. So you are agreeing with yourself? While bsmark's post was obviously slanted toward the negative, yours was just as obviously slanted the other way. We continue

[oullins]

  Sorry if my post was not balanced I just got a bit hot due to a personal attack by a poster on the CEO.The type of comments made  has no place in a company performance discussion.   The post also had a lot of inaccurate data.   My intend was to point out the inaccuracies  it was not a status report on Mart by any way shape or form.

[zeus55]

Thanks oullins, no worries.

[brufan]

"They didn't elaborate if they would keep the AGIP pipeline for backup from what I heard, although that would seem prudent." I remember reading that we are contractually obligated to keep using the AGIP pipeline as per the current pipeline agreement.  I think it was minimum 5000bopd (Mart's share).  I'm sure all the "pipeline losses" on AGIP will

[rgm714]

 A very bad (expensive and long) drilling of UMU10.  Mart is not the guilty party but it is their well, their responsibility, so be it.  By oullins   oullins can you tell us more?  

[bobby1231]

Mart's plan is to use both pipelines.