Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum MGM Energy Corp MGMCF

GREY:MGMCF - Post Discussion

MGM Energy Corp > Mackenzie Valley Pipeline
View:
Post by OilEng on Dec 13, 2013 2:45pm

Mackenzie Valley Pipeline

Here is what the NEB says about the pipeline

By the end of 2013 we require the companies to file an updated cost estimate and report on their decision to build the pipeline... Actual construction must begin by the end of 2015 for our approvals to remain valid.

https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rthnb/pplctnsbfrthnb/mcknzgsprjct/rfd/rfdv1p4-eng.html#cont

Here is my take on the pipeline. I hope it generates some discussion as I don't know have any answers on this.
  1. If Imperial follows the NEB schedule the pipeline could be on-stream by 2017 to 2018??
  2. One of the big holdups has been that the consortium wants the Feds to build the Mackenzie Valley Highway. The section to the gas fields in the Delta from Inuvik to Tuk is under construction and the southern section has been under Environmental Assessment for about a year.
  3. Construction could start as early as 2016 on the section from Wigley to Norman Wells. That section will not take long to build as it only requires one major bridge across the Great Bear River. The section from Norman Wells to Inuvik is a different matter as there is no highway and they will be starting from scatch. (Ft. Good Hope to the Dempster to the really tough part)
  4. The Delta has about 7 Tcf discovered. According to MGM the supply costs is around $6 to $7/mcf. This means that Henry Hub prices have to be that high in order for the project to earn a 10% BIT return.
  5. A lot of shale gas is economic at below the Delta supply costs, so I don't know if we are going to see North American gas prices above this by the time the pipeline is built. As a result, LNG is probably the option that Imperial will be looking at for the Delta gas.
  6. An LNG plant is a long ways off.
  7. The Canol has very roughly the same amount of gas. The difference is that this gas has condensate and is rich in NGL. There is also a lot of oil. Of course this is all dependent on getting some good flow rates, but I am sure - I hestitate to say positive - that the oil and gas is there in billions of barrels. I just don't know how much of it is recoverable.
  8. The Mackenzie Valley Pipeline is a gas pipeline and an NGL pipeline. It is actually two pipelines.
  9. Imperial has large facilties in Norman Wells which are going to cost hundreds of million of dollars to abandon and reclaim. It would make sense for the Canol to use these facilties.
  10. The pipeline consortium is Imperial, Shell and Conoco. You have to beleive that Conoco and Shell are involved in the decision. Although we don't take much about Imperial in the Canol they hold a large acreage position in the condensatae and wet gas windows.
Given these facts, here is my guess:
  1. The Mackenzie Valley Pipeline will be built in two sections: AB to Norman Wells and then Norman Wells to the Delta.
  2. The first section to Norman Wells will be built according to the NEB schedule with construction starting in 2015. They may ask for a delay until the all-weather road is completed and more testing is done.
  3. The section from Norman Wells to the Delta is a long ways off.
  4. The existing Enbridge oil pipeline will be converted to NGL's and a new oil pipelilne will be built. I think it makes sense to build it to the tidewater rather than AB. It might end up in Valdez AK I know that Henry said that that option had gotten legs in the last few months.
The pipeline consortium has spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this project and an approved pipelilne project is not something that is going to be walked away from without careful consideration

Lets here your thoughts folks.
Comment by johncalgary on Dec 13, 2013 2:59pm
My personal take on this is they will announce its a go. Its in the natioal interest. The govenment wants this their vision is long range. They will pump it specially during the next election.
Comment by bypp on Dec 13, 2013 9:28pm
OilEng - I became a shareholder of MGM for the exposure to the Canol shale oil play, and honestly never bothered to learn much about the history of the natural gas in the north. It is certainly a very telling tale in which it seems the regulatory system took so long to work through that the opportunity had come and gone. Hopefully they've learned their lesson and the devolution provides a ...more  
Comment by glacierman on Dec 13, 2013 10:11pm
Bypp, I'll take a stab at this before others join in.   The MVP would be a huge boast to any company with conventional gas reserves let alone future shale gas.    Here is what Husky said in a Q&A with Tulita residents (I've inserted the companies that would benefit): Community Member:   Now that you (Husky) have signed a 10 year Access and Benefits agreement ...more  
Comment by geodude13 on Dec 14, 2013 7:54am
OilEng, you nailed the issues. The overview provided is an Executive Summary of issues; moderate but knowledgeable opinion. There is a tonne of political hair on building out the MVP but the current government is seeing the need to open up the north. The Russians and Europeans are reaching further into frontiers and arctic resources and Canada can't afford to be the last ones in. Technology ...more  
Comment by OilEng on Dec 14, 2013 10:39am
In B.C., the aboriginal population is against the Northern Gateway and resource development beccuase they have unsettled land claims.  However, in the NWT aboriginal population has largely settled and is going to share in the bounty directly.  I am not sure if this will be enough to get them on side, but here is what those who settled get: 25% of the Crown Royalties under the ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities