Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.

GREY:NMKEF - Post Discussion

Nemaska Lithium Inc > My complaint to Pallinghurst
View:
Post by mick1888 on Aug 26, 2020 1:48am

My complaint to Pallinghurst

Which we should all do. We can't just lay back and roll over for them to shaft us. We should all mobilise and take action, complain to whatever authorities are available to us in all jurisdictions. My thoughts are to complain direct to Pallinghurst, then take it further if I can, including the UK Ombudsman. My email; Dear Directors Can you please explain to me why you have abandoned the ordinary shareholders of NMX, when your original offer in 2019 incorporated them in your future plan for the project? In fact, with the incorporation of funds (up to $300m) from IQ, and the settlement of the Nordic Bonds early 2020, the current situation is even better now than it was in 2019. So why then have you back tracked in being all inclusive of existing stakeholders? Can you please disclose what discussions and meetings your executives have had with Investment Quebec and / or Minister Fitzgibbon since October 2019, in particular from December 2019 to end January 2020? It would be appreciated if you could clarify what influence any such meetings or discussions have had in Pallinghurst changing their course with NMX common shareholders in mind? Lastly, do you have a complaints procedure than can accommodate a dissatisfied third party being affected by Pallinghurst actions? Best Regards
Comment by Tcheck on Aug 26, 2020 9:54am
me, mick i think we should sue nmx here instead and contest their decision  .the board they accept a lower offer of pallinghurst than the one originally proposed .we would have received 25 cents for our shares and the new offer offers zero . they didnt act in the interest of all stakeholders as they pretend . only IQ can be behind this turn of events .they downbidded and this was accepted . ...more  
Comment by stinckyfingers on Aug 27, 2020 11:36am
Now we all know what it feel like to take it up the sphincter from the Quebecois.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities