RE:re: a scenarioYes. I'd agree that at some juncture going forward a full spinning off of the perhaps remaining VoltaXplore class A equities, which would be necessarily priced as part of a financing initiative requiring NanoXplore to exchange 55% of VoltaXplore's class A equities with a certain equity investing partner and long term NanoXplore customer, would likely occur ridethewinners.
After all, I've suggested as much and much more about three years ago.
You suggested VoltaXplore class A shares "would trade low volume at a very low price should VoltaXplore shares be publicly listed today".
You also pointed out Martinrea International Inc willingly sold 50% for 20 million and suggested that VoltaXplore is not worth much more than that today".
Although that could in part be somewhat accurate, I would suggest that Martinrea International wanted out to pursue it's wholly owned Effenco subsidiary's partnership with Skeleton, whilst seeking to greatly benefit from Skeleton's partnership with Siemens and the group of collaborating companies who would be supported by Germany's Siemens and likely other "industrial titans" as well.
You should consider that what makes VoltaXplore a heck of a lot more valuable than a mere $20 Million would be what I touched upon earlier ridethewinners.
It's something which Martinrea International and/or it's wholly owned Effenco subsidiary simply do not possess, specifically as relates to NanoXplore's proprietary Graphene BlackTM" enhanced battery cell components chemistries, proprietary process manufacturing and the very-know specifically as relates to graphene and SiGTM" "BAM", amongst other would be licensed graphene materials centric trade secrets and IP.
I've said it long ago and I'll say it again.
As a existing 1MWh pilot plant manufacturing facility operator and a potential 2GWh battery cells manufacturer, VoltaXplore is and would be absolutely nonexistent without , amongst other assets, NanoXplore's provisioned non-exclusive license to utilize NanoXplore's own IP supported battery cells chemistries and NanoXplore's permission to incorporate the various proprietary graphene enhanced battery cell component materials manufactured and supplied by NanoXplore within the battery cell product offerings to be sold globally.
We understand that it simply doesn't matter whether NanoXplore sells of 55% of VoltaXplore or 100% of VoltaXplore to any globally recognized battery cells manufacturer and it's joint venturing automotive manufacturing partner or partners.
What makes the VoltaXplore enterprise viable and immensely quite valuable was and will remain the very suite of intellectual properties which NanoXplore owns and controls and the very know how possessed by Mr. Nazarpour & Co.
By the way, you do know what kinds, quality and quantum of upfront non-refundable cash payments and necessarily very long term recurring payments derived revenues which a non-exclusive and comprehensive commerical IP licensing agreement issued by NanoXplore to a globally recognized battery cells manufacturer and it's joint venturing automotive manufacturing partner or partners would be securing for NanoXplore and it's stakeholders and shareholders alike, yes?
In regards to Martinrea international, said company brought to VoltaXplore and brings to NanoXplore Martinrea's international reach as one of the world's largest OEMs, suppliers of high quality automotive parts and components for the global transportation industry players.
However, what NanoXplore brought and continues to bring to the VoltaXplore equation is and would remain to be of "existential importance", i.e. what Martinrea International brought to VoltaXplore and presently brings in support of NanoXplore is not of "existential importance" and both NanoXplore and the VoltaXplore would do just fine - actually VoltaXplore will do perhaps 100x much better - without Martinrea International as a 50% equity owner of VoltaXplore.
To be continued