Post by
1student on Jun 11, 2023 2:16am
"Going It Alone?" Continued
That being said, consider that during the Q3/2023 conference call the company CFO suggested approximately 55% of VoltaXplore could be sold to a would be controlling equity investing partner and customer, leaving NanoXplore with a 45% stakehold in VoltaXplore.
This would be a remaining 45% equity stakehold which would necessarily have a mutually agreed upon and clearly established per share price attached to each and every perhaps class A share issued by VoltaXplore.
You will note that the total sum monetary value of all those perhaps VoltaXplore class A shares remaining, following the issuance of a 55% stakehold to VoltaXplores then new controlling equity owners of course, would immediately accrue to NanoXplore's balance sheet. Cha! Ching!.
By the way, I am relatively certain that the accrued monetary value in question would not be $10 Million; that was Martinrea's price for NanoXplore's purchase of Martinrea's 50% of VoltaXplore.
In addition to the 55% equity ownership of VoltaXplore for VoltaXplore's new majority equity controlling partners, NanoXplore customers and proprietary 2170 cylindrical cells non-exclusive manufacturers, NanoXplore has plenty more to offfer
I'd expect 10x $10 Million would be just the beginning of what NanoXplore can be provided as a initial non-refundable upfront payment for a non-exclusive commerical IP licensing involving deal.
We understand that the 55% equity ownership of VoltaXplore would be useless to any battery cells manufacturer without NanoXplore's issued non-exclusive license to produce NanoXplore's proprietary graphene enhanced 2170 cylindrical cells.
I've always said you have to "put a price on it" for anyone to take your proprietary graphene enhanced battery cells chemistries suite of IP very seriously.
Soroush Nazarpour won't say it so I will.That was "a steal of a deal" for those XG Sciences assets and the well known chemicals company, a.k.a. the "industrial titan", which Mr Nazarpour suggested he hoped would come along following the purchase of all those XG Sciences assets (see my years ago called Dow Inc - Dow/DuPont involvement).
In addition to the soon to be fully and finally consummated and soon publicly disseminated "commercial agreement" with that well recognized chemicals company, we understand it's now also time to aggressively monetize NanoXplore's graphene enhanced battery cells specific intellectual properties by way of non-exclusive licensing agreements provided to preferred battery cells manufacturers and their automotive manufacturing partners.
Savvy ridethewinners?