Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oromin Explorations Ltd OLEPF

GREY:OLEPF - Post Discussion

Oromin Explorations Ltd > Teranga, JV, etc
View:
Post by mjh9413 on Dec 13, 2010 1:34pm

Teranga, JV, etc

I did not see an answer in subsequent posts but the transaction (MDL to TGZ) was part of the re-org. Teranga holds the 15%.
Now, MDL must have talked to the JV partners before buying the interest in OLE and, as I stated before, based on what was said the intrinsic value given to OLE in the deal was about $1.15.
OLE, unless their Licence has been altered, have to make progress to a mining operation by NEXT MONTH, and I have speculated before that the MDL investment was done as a solution to this requirement, if one accepts that the MDL (now TGZ) exisitng mining operation is allowed to qualify as a mining operation covering all OLE's assets.
Now the price has been beaten back and with current sp movement I suspect we will soon see a buy-out (AMHO) at a slight premium to the original MDL investment in OLE by TGZ. It will be stock or a mix with a little cash but it has to be palatable to JV owners as well as us, but mainly them, unless of course the JV partners really want Teranga paper. If I remember correctly, the jv partners' do not hold an equity interest in OLE but I do not see how this alters the value of their overall interest. (The main point has to be that the jv interest complicates a deal but, as stated, MDL must have tested this before their initial investment.) I reckon buying at these levels, if you want more OLE in your hands, has to offer a minimum 10% short term return, before taxes.
Comment by arlene2 on Dec 13, 2010 4:11pm
mjh9413-----I would think everyone would want more Ole shares in their hands at these prices.........Q-1 Resource Update (60-90 days away) should ,IMO , show a doubling or tripling of todays shareprice.....That is short term opportunity to me...
Comment by bluestar on Dec 13, 2010 6:14pm
i agree,the sp should at least double from here. i would guess by end of jan.
Comment by glasrado on Dec 13, 2010 6:42pm
Look at the charts. Finally wonderful.
Comment by iop42 on Dec 13, 2010 9:22pm
If OLE joins with TGZ/MDL then we become part of the hedger club - selling gold at the price when the contract was made.  This means big losses when the price climbs and even worse if inflation sets in because operating costs will rise.Sell the ore to them for processing but don't join them.  It won't be a good deal.Then asap start a heap leach mine to satisfy the impatient ...more  
Comment by iop42 on Dec 13, 2010 10:16pm
p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }Basedon todays closing prices, Dec. 13, 2010.MDLpre demerger and post rollback $10.70About$600 million capitalisation.MDLshareholders received 2.632917 shares for each mdl;2.632917times $2.87 (tgz closing) = $7.561demerged mdl $4.99 (can. close) = $4.99 pre-mdlshareholders worth =$12.55 (new-mdl + tgz) Thenew MDL has 60 million O/S shares for capitalization of ...more  
Comment by iop42 on Dec 13, 2010 10:35pm
here are some links; https://terangagold.com/investor-relations/gold-sales-contract/ https://www.stockwatch.com/market/market_partic_compan.aspx?symbol=TGZ&region=C https://terangagold.com/investor-relations/presentations/ and press releases as found in www.stockwatch.com
Comment by mjh9413 on Dec 13, 2010 11:07pm
I like your analysis but it doesn't take account of what exactly pre-dist MDL was being valued on, and adding the two post-dist does not represent all that has happened. TGZ for instance now has $140MM in new cash from all those new shares, plus the cash what was left over from the prior issue (minus debt repayment and the $50MM it gave to MDL.) It is all too complicated for my ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities