GREY:RGVNF - Post by User
Comment by
curtisprodon Jul 28, 2010 11:14am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
247 Views
Post# 17303194
RE: RE: Red Mountain NR. . DRILL DEEPER
RE: RE: Red Mountain NR. . DRILL DEEPERDear Monedas
Please clarify a few things:
1. The histroical data shows that you "must drill deeper than 300 meters" to encounter any gold of significant concentrations.
Which historical data? Are you implying that gold is only found below 300 meters and that there are no significant gold finds above 300 meters?
2. The hole reported was 287 meters and guess what ---- Nothing of interest.
Would would be "of interest?" They didn't assay anything yet. They can't claim anything before an official assay.
So what would you be looking for in the PR that would be of interest?
The last question is important. What can they say in this PR that would indicate to you that there was something "interesting"?
I really want to know. Thanks...