Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF

GREY:SCSZF - Post Discussion

Second Wave Petroleum Inc > First quarter review
View:
Post by zenda on May 15, 2013 8:35am

First quarter review

First Quarter Review


Production in the first quarter averaged approximately 1,693 boe/d (71%
 oil and natural gas liquids) representing a 7% and 20% decrease from
 2012 fourth quarter and first quarter rates, respectively. A total of
 1,575 boe/d or approximately 93% of Second Wave's corporate production
 is derived from its Judy Creek core area in Alberta. First quarter 2013
 production dropped from fourth quarter 2012 levels as the Company shut
 in approximately 60 boe/d of net Beaverhill Lake production to
 accommodate off-setting drilling activity and the retirement of maximum
 rate limitation penalties, and curtailed an additional 75 boe/d of
 Pekisko production. Subsequent to the quarter end the shut-in
 Beaverhill Lake production has been brought back on line while the
 curtailed Pekisko production is expected to be brought back on line in
 the third and fourth quarters.


Average sales revenue per unit in the quarter was $59.76 per boe
 representing a 7% increase and a 10% decrease from 2012 fourth quarter
 and first quarter levels, respectively. The reduction in sales revenue
 per unit on a year-over-year basis is directly related to a drop in
 benchmark oil prices and increased oil differentials for crude oil
 produced in Alberta. On a quarter-over-quarter basis pricing has
 increased by approximately 7% as oil prices, oil differentials and
 natural gas pricing have improved since the fourth quarter of 2012.


Operating costs averaged approximately $25.36 per boe for the first
 quarter of 2013 representing a 17% and 1% increase from 2012 fourth
 quarter and first quarter levels.  On a quarter-over-quarter basis the
 operating cost increase was related primarily to the implementation and
 operation of the Company's close proximity Pekisko waterflood pilot in
 Judy Creek and certain seasonal costs that are typically incurred in
 the first quarter of each year.  The Company anticipates that its
 operating costs will trend downward over the second half of the year as
 its Pekisko production increases as a consequence of bringing curtailed
 Pekisko production back on line and re-pressuring of the Pekisko pool
 in its close proximity pilot waterflood area.


Operating netbacks remained consistent with fourth quarter 2012 levels
 at $25.77 per boe. Year-over-year netbacks decreased by 26% due
 primarily to higher royalty rates and lower commodity pricing.


The Company's Beaverhill Lake production in the first quarter was
 approximately 1,005 boe/d (80% oil and natural gas liquids) or 11%
 lower than fourth quarter 2012 levels with 60 boe/d or approximately
 half of this decline attributed to shut-in volumes as noted above and
 the remainder related to natural production declines. The Company
 successfully drilled and completed one (0.4 net) horizontal Beaverhill
 Lake well during the quarter at 12-25-063-10W5; however production
 testing was not initiated until very late in the first quarter with
 little to no sales volumes occurring in the first quarter. Subsequent
 to the quarter end the 12-25 well was tested for a total of
 approximately 33 days with cumulative oil production, estimated from
 field data, of 20,450 bbl over this test period for an average initial
 production rate of 620 bbl/d of oil. The 12-25 well was shut in April
 30, 2012 and the Company currently anticipates that it will come back
 on production upon the installation of surface pumping equipment early
 in the third quarter of 2013.


The Company cautions that test results and initial production rates are
 not necessarily indicative of long-term performance or ultimate
 recovery.


Pekisko production in Judy Creek remained relatively constant
 quarter-over-quarter at 567 boe/d in the first quarter of 2013 versus
 575 boe/d in the fourth quarter of 2012. Production additions in the
 first quarter from bringing on one (1.0 net) horizontal oil well were
 offset by curtailments as the Company re-directed the majority of its
 produced water volumes in its waterflood from the northwest end of the
 Judy Creek pool to its close proximity water flood pilot area at the
 south end of the pool. The Company anticipates it will take 3 to 6
 months to re-pressurize the close proximity pilot water flood area, at
 which time the produced water from the pool will be more equitably
 distributed resulting in the expected return of approximately 75 boe/d
 of curtailed production in the north.


As previously announced on May 6, 2013 and May 13, 2013, subsequent to
 the quarter end Second Wave issued to Brookfield Bridge Lending Fund
 Inc. ("Brookfield"), the Company's controlling shareholder, a $17.5
 million principal amount 7.5% secured convertible debenture for net
 proceeds of $17,325,000, and received a non-binding proposal from
 Brookfield to privatize Second Wave by acquiring all common shares of
 the Company not already owned by Brookfield and its affiliates for cash
 consideration of $0.30 per share.  Brookfield currently holds
 approximately 47.5% of the outstanding Second Wave common shares.  A
 special committee of independent directors of the Company is
 supervising the preparation of a formal valuation of Second Wave
 pursuant to applicable securities laws and otherwise evaluating the
 Brookfield proposal.  Second Wave will make a further announcement if
 and at such time as a definitive agreement is entered into with
 Brookfield regarding a going private transaction or the privatization
 proposal otherwise becomes binding.


Comment by Iamwcw on May 15, 2013 10:43am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities