TSX:SRV.UN - Post by User
Comment by
flamingogoldon Jun 04, 2021 4:39pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0340-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
67 Views
Post# 33333080
RE:RE:And Janes responds....
RE:RE:And Janes responds....My vote is still with Mr. Janes, maybe moreso now. Hard for me to get past the secret launch of Renegade out of Jacks kitchens with no planned residuals for the Fund, then the lowball $3.55 bid, and now the stacking of the board to essentially silence Janes? Not exactly a great track record. Mr. Janes' board proposal is fair, but certainly not what SIR is attempting to do.
Let's face it, without Mr. Janes activism, we wouldn't even be having this discussion because we shareholders would have been wiped out with huge losses. End of story.
BlueJay2020 wrote: This is getting uglier by the day! I wouldn't fancy being Sandra Levy trying to referee the boxing match if Lembit's proposal comes to fruition!
I like how he got the lowball Fowler offer in there - nice work.
I am still curious, though, as to how he plans to advance the two remaining objectives of the three he has stated.
Robsopinion wrote: Popcorn out,
blue proxy, gold proxy, he said, he said,
the soap box battle continues.