Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Syntroleum Corporation SYNM

NDAQ:SYNM - Post Discussion

Syntroleum Corporation > Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL
View:
Post by fredski on Jul 06, 2010 9:56pm

Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL

Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL (GAS TOLIQUIDS)

Commodities/ NaturalGasJul 06, 2010 - 05:09 PM

By: Submissions

Commodities

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleManinder Singh Batra writes: Shale gas in the past few years, has emerged as a tough competitor to conventional natural gas due tothe massive increase in spot natural gas prices and advancement inhydraulic fracturing technology . But lately,since 2009 , there hasbeen a massive decline in the natural gas spot prices(Henry Hub) ,dueto massive glut in the natural gas market .


Most Shale gas players cannot make profit and maintain at ratesbelow 5$/Mcf , as proven by Chesapeake CEO’s Statement :
“McClendon admitted on the company’s February earnings call that $5.00per million BTU pricing on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX)equates to $3.50 gas at the wellhead, once differentials like gatheringand compression costs are included in the cost calculus. “Even $3.50gas at the wellhead does not create enough cash flow in the industry tomaintain today’s drilling price — even for the best-managed shaleplays,” he said.

Excluding takeaway-pipeline expenses (like gathering andcompression costs), Chesapeake posted, on average, production anddevelopment costs of $3.47 per Mcfe, according to the company’s 2009 annual earnings report.”

And currently , as the natural gas price chart shows that thecurrent prices are below 5$. The only reason why Shale Gas players had managed to earn profit in the first quarter of 2010,was due to hedging gains.

But , this cannot continue forever and ultimately ,the shale gasindustry will suffer losses ,if the natural gas spot prices continue toremain this low . But , there are better alternatives ,like convertingthis natural gas into synthetic diesel and Gasoline , or even syntheticlight crude using FT process to convert the gas into liquids.

Considering that the crude oil prices are hovering around 72$ ,itwill be very profitable to convert the gas into GTL Diesel, ATF ,naphtha . also there are several new GTL technologies and small scaleGTL plants coming up and these have conversion efficiencies and energy efficienciesmuch greater than conventional large scale GTL plants .

So, rather than just competing with natural gas , shale gas playersshould also invest in GTL .

By Maninder Singh Batra

maninder300@hotmail.com

© 2010 Copyright Maninder Singh Batra - All Rights Reserved

Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities