Psych01, it appears that the user may be dealing with mental health issues or leading a monotonous life, which could lead them to express skewed viewpoints online. They voice their opinions on a stock without providing a solid justification. After being called out for basing their analysis on gut feelings, spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), and promoting conspiracy theories, the user started playing the victim role and masquerading as a shareholder, seemingly to win over vulnerable investors. As an Argnonaut Gold investor, I perceive this user as a threat, attempting to craft a bearish narrative and persuade susceptible users to heed their advice without question. This user poses a risk, and I would recommend disregarding and reporting all of their posts.
Conversations about stock investments should focus on meticulous analysis rather than gut feelings or conspiracy theories. Both of these can lead to unreliable decisions as they are based on unverified information, subjectivity, and emotional biases.
The presence of misinformation and subjectivity can lead to ill-advised decisions. Individuals who depend on their intuition or conspiracy theories might make choices based on uncorroborated claims.
Investing driven by emotions can result in unfavorable decisions, such as buying when prices are high due to greed and selling when prices are low due to fear. Hasty selling of stocks during market downturns, driven by panic, can also be detrimental in the long term.
A significant disadvantage of relying on gut feelings or conspiracy theories is the absence of analytical reasoning. Skipping a thorough analysis of pertinent data can lead to unsatisfactory investment results.
In conclusion, it’s generally more advantageous to base investment decisions on comprehensive research and analysis. This involves a detailed examination of market trends, company performance, and other relevant data, which is often neglected by those who invest based on gut feelings or conspiracy theories.