Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Artis Real Estate Investment Pref Shs Series E T.AX.P.E

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.AX.P.I | T.AX.UN | ARESF

Artis Real Estate Investment Trust is an unincorporated closed-end REIT based in Canada. Artis REIT's portfolio comprises properties located in Central and Western Canada and select markets throughout the United States, including regions such as Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Saskatchewan, Arizona, Minnesota, Colorado, New York, and Wisconsin. The properties are divided into three categories: office, retail, and industrial. The industrial properties account for most of the portfolio, followed by the office properties and the retail properties.


TSX:AX.P.E - Post by User

Comment by Frankie10on Mar 16, 2024 10:35am
38 Views
Post# 35936476

RE:RE:artis versus hr

RE:RE:artis versus hrAll great points. I would however disagree with your last point regarding cost of equity implied by dividend yield. For the same reason you illustrate above regarding valuation - you cannot look to the distribution/dividend given it is descretionary in nature - you should look to the underlying of the dividend which is FCF. Same with cost of equity - no Valuator should use dividend yield as proxy for cost of equity. When determining cost of equity, one should look to enterprise risk and total expected return to equity owners. For example, Google's cost of equity is not nil, and Dream Office's cost of equity has not been reduced along with its "dividend cut". 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>