RE:RE:Revenue CollapseChances are pretty good that you're right regarding some posters using multiple aliases nellybb.
But what is gained by spending time trying to "prove" that they do so?
Most posters that don't provide meaningful/supporting detail to back up their opinions (whether negative or positive) about any company on these stock bullboards.
Those that whine, call constant negative or unrealistically pump and speculate are generally regarded as "annoying jerks" that are only clogging up what has potential to be useful exchanges of information and ideas.
Of course, that suggests the poster truly has an interest in the particular company and isn't just entertaining themselves or being a pain.
Reports/NR's from a few companies are likely transparent and precise but not all and very few posters, if any, genuinely have an "inside track" or unique information source.
Everyone takes what they can from whatever information is available and usually comes to their own conclusions.
Anyone relying on what they find here would be in a bad way I think, though there's a slight possibility they'll pick up something to send them searching in a new direction.
Wouldn't it be great if everyone actually put some thought and content into their remarks so others would know exactly "Why" they have good or bad opinions about the stock?
E.g.:
"I don't trust the CEO" isn't enough.
"Why" don't you trust the CEO? What did they do? What was wrong with that? What might have been a better action? etc.
If posters were serious and trying to share helpful information "Aliases wouldn't be used at all."
For what it's worth (Zero actually) I have two aliases. 1 for each of my active emails:
WinterBaron and Howard46.
Yep... my name is actually Howard.
For some reason: Stockhouse won't merge them even though they've been asked to do so a few times.