Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

Alternate Symbol(s): BDRPF | BDRXF | BDRAF | BDRBF | T.BBD.B | T.BBD.PR.B | T.BBD.PR.C | BOMBF | T.BBD.PR.D

Industrials Aerospace & Defense

Bombardier Inc. is a Canada-based manufacturer of business aircraft with a global network of service centers. The Company is focused on designing, manufacturing and servicing business jets. The Company has a worldwide fleet of more than 5,000 aircraft in service with a variety of multinational corporations, charter and fractional ownership providers, governments and private individuals. It operates aerostructure, assembly and completion facilities in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Its robust customer support network services the Learjet, Challenger and Global families of aircraft, and includes facilities in strategic locations in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China and Australia. The Company's jets include Challenger 350, Challenger 3500, Challenger 650, Global 5500, Global 6500, Global 7500 and Global 8000.

TSX:BBD.A - Post by User

Bombardier Inc. > Which fighter is better for Bombardier?

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by stockitnowon Jan 03, 2022 12:16pm

253 Views

Post# 34279374

RE:RE:RE:Which fighter is better for Bombardier?

Saab is not working with Bombardier, they are working with IMP. If Saab sets up facilities in Montreal it will be through IMP for Grippen work. Any facilities for Saab assembly work in Montreal has potential for poaching Bombardier employees. If Saab was working with Bombardier it would already been advertised by Saab. Remember all of this was submitted during initial bidding process. If Saab changes the term then expect protest from IMP, Boeing, Lockheed and Airbus. All submissions are done. Any changes opens Goverment of Canada to protest and lengthy legal battle from all other bidding company.

clubhouse19 wrote: Your statement "Neither fighter jet contract will bring any benefit to Bombardier." is quite baseless since on their own part of the proposal
"As part of this package Saab will establish two new aerospace centers in the Greater Montreal Region. These centers will help support a resurgent aerospace sector, building on its domestic excellence, while spurring development in new areas of research and giving the next generation of talented Canadians a career route and future."

Quite clearly states the Montreal area. Are you inplying that IMP will set up shop in the Montreal area and Bombardier will have no participation ?

You also have to remember that when these proposals were first set up, Bombardier was no where near the turn-around stage it is at now. I can see at least the St, laurent facilities being set up for part and to say that Bombardier will not be involved whatsoever is quite baseless.

stockitnow wrote: Neither fighter jet contract will bring any benefit to Bombardier. If Saab is choosen then it will be build by IMP aeropsace in East coast. Lockheed has its own supply change and Canadian suppliers already. Those suppliers will benefit more from Canadian order. If anything, it seems Saab being build in Canada will put pressure on tight aeropsace jobs in Canada. Saab assembly work could put pressure on same work force that Bombardier has. Military contracts pay more. As an investor I dont want bombardier to go on bidding war on wagers.

Lukegermany wrote: I know the most her are canadians, but as an investor for me it is important which fighter brings bombardier more money.

Is there any money for the bomber at all in this deal?
Does the Goverment will see some part made in Canada?