RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:All good for now
PabloLafortune wrote: I was not and am not comparing the company Bombardier to Nortel. I was warning investors against irrational exuberance by analysts and stockhouse posters which basically is what the last 2 pages of stockhouse posts was .. I said I was a Cassandra put a star on the word Cassandra as a "footnote" and gave an example of what I did in that regard in the past and used the example of Nortel for emphasis - because the fact remains analysts were pumping the tires on Nortel when it was $75 and indirectly caused some investors to lose a lot of money. If my write up was about comparing Bombardier with Nortel I would have put it in the main text. My message - to other investors - is to be careful as while 2022 was a very good year for Bombardier, in actual fact most if not all the debt reduction was because of backlog increase and significant free cashflow from operations has yet to materialize. In my opinion with respect to Bombardier, investors should be cautiously optimistic - not irrationally exuberant - and not put too many eggs in one basket either.If I caused some readers to question the irrational exuberance on stockhouse with respect to Bombardier, I've done my job. Now, go you know what.
na na na , don't you try that twisting chit stuff here ...just beacuse you put an asterix doesn't remove what you said ..you compared the 2 because you used exhuberance a measure and compared the 2 .. this is not the same thing here , you do not have the same scenario and no need to give examples of Cassandra to warn shareholders that they are at risk ..the whole market is based on risk and I say it all the time "I trust me" ... I do however understand that there might be over-exhuberance but don't put Nortel in there ...GLTA