RE:RE:RE:Which fighter is better for Bombardier?Did you read the cbc article today? "Saab, on the other hand, is pitching that Canadian Gripens be assembled in Canada (at IMP Aerospace& Defence in Nova Scotia) and more importantly that all of the intellectual property rights for sustainment and operations become the property of the federal government. That by itself is a significant concession thatwould give Canada sovereign control over its fighter jet fleet in a manner that has not been seen in decades".
clubhouse19 wrote: I guess then you haven't read the Piece by saab in the quote about the facilities in Montreal ..nothing mentioned about the east coast. I presume you have some back up to confirm your satement of fact ?
quote=stockitnow]Neither fighter jet contract will bring any benefit to Bombardier. If Saab is choosen then it will be build by IMP aeropsace in East coast. Lockheed has its own supply change and Canadian suppliers already. Those suppliers will benefit more from Canadian order. If anything, it seems Saab being build in Canada will put pressure on tight aeropsace jobs in Canada. Saab assembly work could put pressure on same work force that Bombardier has. Military contracts pay more. As an investor I dont want bombardier to go on bidding war on wagers.
Lukegermany wrote: I know the most her are canadians, but as an investor for me it is important which fighter brings bombardier more money.
Is there any money for the bomber at all in this deal?
Does the Goverment will see some part made in Canada?
[/quote]