RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ok I wiil say itThat statement by Kelvin was for informational purposes , he never said tomorrow , next week or next year , he was just pointing out the possibility of maybe the inevitability of that possibility. 30 odd years ago , it was all about Japan as China produced junk , now fast forward , Japan is a non starter and it's China , whose prosperity is increasing exponentially , so since The USA replaced the UK and Japan replaced the USA and now it's China turn , what makes you think Kelvins thesis is invalid. The difference is between here and now and forward thinking.