Post by
xbox360 on Aug 18, 2017 2:13am
Wow
So at $2.25, Waterous Energy Fund lost about 90 million in share price valuation. Not sure if Waterous acquisition made the price drop, though I guess he should've waited longer to purchase his 67% ownership if it was not the Waterous acquisition that made the price drop.
According to Cona's Q2 report, the company should be able to pay back close to 30 million per quarter and/or generate ~30 million in FCF every quarter. They may have overstated their FCF, though it should be over 20 million per quarter. So, 100 million in FCF per year and the market cap is around 200 million? It should take the company two years to pay back about 50% of their debt, in a conservative estimate. After that, the return per share price basis is close to 50%.
If Waterous is not offering to buy the remaining shares, the shares should be trading at least double the price in two years.
Comment by
OOU812 on Aug 18, 2017 9:38am
"So, 100 million in FCF per year and the market cap is around 200 million?" Free cash flow is around $50 million a year.See link, pg 8 https://www.conaresources.com/uploads/Documents/cona-corp-aug-2017.pdf
Comment by
ppp on Aug 18, 2017 11:27am
Capex of 60 mil seems a little high to stay flat for production. These guys say they have a decline rate of 12%. So they need to replace just over 2000 bbls a year. So 30,000 per flowing. Cheaper to buy production at the moment.
Comment by
OOU812 on Aug 22, 2017 7:21pm
Based on Cona's cash flow for 2013 and 2014 (WTI averaged $102 cdn) and using average production of 17,000 bopd.Yearly cash flow would be around $200 mil and free cash flow around $130 mil.