RE:RE:RE:RE:Thank you but ???If this was directed at me aur, please see response to your last post.
To add here, I have had no indication to date that BoD, and/or Beena should not have my trust and I watch pretty close as I have a lot to lose. I have seen the small get picked up by the large, especially with a brand new sector such as cannabis which is going to move even faster because the product is not new, it is just being legal that is new.
FIRE is a premium quality producer and has been from the jump and I wish we were ready for rec when it became legal, with CPG in place, etc....hind sight is always 20/20. While probably too late to have made the chages we are still getting top dollar, or close to, and WEED has gone from one of the last we would want to be a part of, to probably the best of all, in the not to distant future. Only info and facts to the contrary could justify voting against the deal. JMHO...Opt
aurorahigh wrote: Point taken but what info needed? We know the terms as stated in initial nr. Illegal doings? No, just business. Prior mgmt plays a larger part. Beena did a great job however as the industry matures she realized it’d be a harder task to tackle on it’s own.
And when do we get to decide what fmv or what we’re worth etc to meet our objective? Nice idea but investing in stocks usually doesn’t work that way. I trust what beena is telling us going forward for the company and it’s shareholders.
Q3 numbers I’d expect to be flat or slightly down as has been alluded to. What more do people need to see to realize this is a very good move for fire going forward. Don’t marry your stock, easier said than done apparently for some.